And the Bush lovers say there is not a civil war. are the Bush lovers crazy?
2006-08-16 08:44:40 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes they are blood thirsty warmongers
2006-08-16 08:56:54 · answer #1 · answered by Mohammed R 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I knew I should have taken up undertaker schooling. So, can you share with us how many of those dead Iraqies were killed by suicide or car bombs? Does it make you feel better that those people are killing each other and would kill each other more if we wern't there? Its not a civil war, in such a war there is a need to oust a bad government, but since there is no government how can it be ousted? Now lets think about this, your saying only Bush lovers are crazy? Ok, I can go along with this classification, but what does it say about the rest of us who aren't Bush Lovers? Does it say we are powerless because even the last democratic runner for president said we needed to stay there, so, shouldn't we be seeking answers from these crazy people about why we should be there rather than abusing them?
2006-08-16 08:59:17 · answer #2 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not of the number, but we're well aware that the Sunni / Baathists, supporters of your beloved, Saddam, have been brutally murdering the Shiites for years now.
But from reports we have, while it IS sectarian violence, civil war is NOT inevitable. There seems to be an issue with the police forces that contribute to the violence. The Iraqi army is steadfast. Only if the Iraqi army splinters and joins the violence will we then know it is a full civil war.
We appreciate the situation, and apparently have a much greater understanding of such things than our ignorant loudmouthed opponents.
2006-08-16 08:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm only aware of the fact that 2600 American soldiers have died in combat. That's what we need to focus on.
These soldiers are heroes. Let's concentrate on finding a political solution that will bring the rest of our soldiers home alive.
I believe that you need to concentrate your energy on supporting your country rather than bashing a sitting president. Think about solutions to the current problems rather than future elections.
But, hey, that's only my opinion. You certainly have the right to say what you want. And I have the right to disagree with you.
2006-08-16 09:08:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A small group of people is responsible for those numbers... not the population at large. 90% of Iraqis would love the fighting to stop.
But then again, if Iraq tumbles into a ball of flame and chaos, nothing would make lefties and Democrats such as yourself happier eh?
2006-08-16 08:49:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are you aware theres a war going on over their? Are you aware war produces casualties, both military and civilian? Are you aware war is nothing new and has always been around???
2006-08-16 08:52:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow! human beings would properly be so insensitive and so disconnected. provided that our us of a desire the oil grant to maintain our international locations contemporary call for to assist ours and the worlds contemporary life. the international international locations desire for the u . s . to maintain its contemporary international domination to regulate peace and regrettably there will be casualties. No ask your self different international locations hate us and our electorate are divided. i'm sorry to ALL people who has lost love ones on the casualties of conflict. My apologies to the insensitive feedback of the unwell tell brothers and sisters at YA to those that can't stand the comments published. it is sickening to think of that those self same all and sundry is those that reward from the consequence of conflict and yet they no longer value and comprehend to human beings that gave up lots. it relatively is no longer purely a activity that this infantrymen have been despatched there. They died scuffling with for his or her delight of their us of a. conflict is something we would desire to continuously stay away from yet we would desire to continuously additionally defend our us of a's interest and ourselves specially value. i'm getting it, yet no longer all will.
2016-10-02 04:16:01 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why is everything bush's fault? the country does not want to be free ...no one knew that....remeber Hilary and most democrats voted in the begining to go into Irag. then they turned about and said it was a bad idea. they had that luxary.
2006-08-16 08:51:51 · answer #8 · answered by shawnb2480 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think anyone who thinks Bush is a good leader has issues. But you have to understand that its those people who are either:
Being made rich from Bush's decisions
or
are just being taken in by the political spin.
2006-08-16 08:50:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Big deal, a lot more people than that died here in America. If only 3500 people in a country that size died in one month, they must have wonderful hospitals.
2006-08-16 08:50:08 · answer #10 · answered by sethle99 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I feel sorry for them. But all of their deaths weren't worth the life of one single U S Soldier. Oh, by the way..... do you know just how many US soldiers died there last month?
2006-08-16 08:58:45 · answer #11 · answered by Beaumeader 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋