Neither. It is necessary to maintain civilization. Otherwise, anarchy.
Plus, look at it this way: The prime directive of women is security. To achieve that, a committed man is required. Therefore women created civilization because monogomy is, for men, learned behavior.
Oh, wait.... I forgot that in modern America (thanks to 40 years of hijacked Feminism) women no longer need a man, men are now an option.
never mind.
2006-08-16 09:07:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by who WAS #1? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its a societal construction developed for a number of reasons. The most recent one was the industrial revolution which could could not flourish without a stable societal system. A society rampant with irresponsible sexual activity and needy illegitimate children could not support the regimentation required by assembly lines and schedules. Also, since female sexual capacity is virtually unlimited and males are subject to the limits of physical endurance society decided that the female libido had to be controlled or the men would never be able to go out hunting for the daily kill or go to work at the office.
2006-08-16 08:51:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You might find this strange, but polygamy is a minority practice throughtout the world. Many cultures practice polygamy, polyandry and other forms of marriages that are older than recorded history. Evenin western countries, whiler strict monogamy might be the norm for many people, others practice serial monogamy, that is, marry & divorce & marry & divorce...
The various forms of marriage are part of being human, not any one marriage practice.
2006-08-16 08:43:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are one of the very few known species which are monogamous...and I am not fully convinced that its a human trait, but rather something that is instilled in us from day one.
so my vote is definetely cultural!
2006-08-16 08:49:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by dragonflypurity 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe it is cultural, because I am not totally convinced Humans were naturally made to be monagamous.
2006-08-16 08:41:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Olive Green Eyes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
lets properly be polygamous, monogamous, or chaste depending on our maximum urgent social desires of the prompt. Polygamy (and this contains both polygyny AND polyandry, now) makes the most sense once you're a youthful, suffering us of a with very few human beings and elements to bypass round. Monogamy makes the most sense once you discover your legs. Chastity makes the most sense if abundance will grow to be too tremendous, and the inhabitants desires to dwindle really. that's now to not say that human beings continually adventure their sexuality with what's outfitted to their society, unavoidably, yet i imagine that could want to describe why we've a penchant to fill many differing sorts of sexual roles. we are a social creature. we ought to take cues from the persons and societies surrounding us, and then tailor our personal needs and needs to what's healthiest for us as a set. you may want to correctly be opposite, for sure, inspite of the undeniable fact that it would want to likely recommend you'd be more effective at threat of being ostracized, or perhaps placed you in harm's way. evaluate a creative from a conflict-torn us of a attempting to attain numbers to overthrow a dictatorship, AND be monogamous mutually. evaluate attempting to be chaste interior the same difficulty. try being polygamous in a city the position there are literally three hundred human beings filled into each sq. mile. particular roles are more effective efficient for particular circumstances.
2016-11-25 21:11:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Women are monogamous. Men are not. That is why you should back the hell off when we smell like perfume.
2006-08-16 08:40:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by breakoutthenukes 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe its both actually
2006-08-16 08:43:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by gardendoglavender 2
·
0⤊
0⤋