English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Posted by JimW:
hateful reactionaries with no plans to salvage Republican votes except shameless character assination.

If it were not for the ACLU the christian conservatives would STILL have the right to do minorities bodily harm.

Jim seems to speak for all liberals. I am just curiuos, are all liberals this hateful and closeminded? Jim has forgotten that the Southern Democrats were the ones who fought the civil rights movement. Is this kind of hate speech indictive of a person or group who wishes harm on his fellow americans? He seems to have forgotten that moderate southerners exiled the KKK.

2006-08-16 07:57:14 · 10 answers · asked by therandman 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Let's not forget the fact that Bush's administration has more minorities working for him than any democratic administration EVER! Nice to see democrats are consistant with HYPOCRISY!

2006-08-16 08:07:39 · update #1

Glad to see that you have to live in the past to make yourself feel better - JW & Ans!

2006-08-16 08:09:04 · update #2

Dems - you mean like your guy Sen. Robert Bryd - an ex grand marshall of the KKK - who is still active in the democratic party. Pot meet Kettle. More examples of liberal double standards!

2006-08-16 09:17:44 · update #3

10 answers

First off, no one speaks for me. I am quite capable of doing it myself. Secondly, "shameless character assassination" is a part of modern politics, and it is done by both sides, although Republicans seem to be better at it. Is it consistent with democratic though? No.

Dixiecrat's were conservative white Southerners, most of whom, like Strom Thurmond, eventually aligned with the Republican Party. The majority opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and racial segregation. The ACLU did fight several good civil rights cases, including Brown v. Board of Education and Loving vs. Virginia, both of which were opposed by Dixiecrat's.
Johnson (D), in 1964, lost the deep south because he advocated passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. No Democrat won the deep south again until Carter in 1976.

Southern Democrats were the ones fighting hardest AGAINST the civil rights movement. Most "southern Democrats" of the 60's, like Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms and Phil Gramm, had switched to the Republican party by the early 80's. Southern Democrats now are very much like their northern counterparts - moderate to liberal and pro-civil rights- now that the Dixiecrats have shown their true allegiance and have gone to the other side.

edit:
I am not a Dem., Byrd is not "my guy". I haven't seen a politician in a long time worthy of the office they hold, with the possible exception of a few of the former Governors in my state. Why does it seem like only the most morally repugnant people this country has to offer go into national politics. Don't we deserve better?

2006-08-16 08:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0 1

seems like john above me here has a pretty good grasp on reality and you my friend are part of the spin destroying the fabric of america .
IF the conservatives had left the liiberals alone ,we would of left you wackos alone .
NO you are to involved in having it your way .So when you take away our rights we use your laws to strip you of yours . You just can not see it is all ! .To dumb i suspect .
I often wonder what court rulings are used to remove religious icons from public property .Could it be that if you had left drugs porno and gays alone they would have remained a small and less vocal group then today .
WHEN you denied them basic human rights they banned together and attacked back .
YOU use the bible and religion as the justification for ending a persons right to choose what goes in thier body and for this they removed god from schools and soon you will not be able to have a cross on your buildings if it is visible from a publicly funded paved roadway .
IF everyone minded there own business and did not attack the ones who ae different this lifestyle would not be the form of rebellion youth takes against authority .
SO drugs porno and homosexuality is on the rise .
NOTHING you can do except get the lawyers out and defend your kid when he gets busted doing rebellious things .
USE to be a joy ride and some drinking .
IT has gotten out of control these days .
the only respect anyone gets is that aquired through money and power .

2006-08-17 09:16:40 · answer #2 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0 0

the line of socialism and a loose usa is a central authority's administration over the guy. there is not any defined decrease, via fact each and every thing has a modicum of socialism. case in point, welfare is a socialist theory. that doesn't make the rustic socialist, however the government does prepare socialist ideals. finished socialism is that 2nd once you go searching, and you already know the the government has administration of you cash, your interest, and finally your existence. it rather is often perceived as a sturdy ingredient via many, via fact they have the secure practices of the government at the back of them, even though it is likewise very risky, via fact the government has a power over you and your existence. Defining a precise line or time that socialism takes over is a complicated theory. you're on the final music once you're speaking with reference to the remoted circumstances i.e. taxes, well being care, etc. This is composed of Europe, via fact the government has administration over well being care, has administration of money (via exponentially expanding revenues taxes), or perhaps has administration over the quantity of electrical energy, gasoline, and water the citizen makes use of. it rather is the factor of entire administration that defines socialism. As reported earlier, there are some socialist concepts that have matriculated into the US, yet we are no longer a socialist usa (yet) via fact the government does not have entire possession over the voters of its usa. i desire this solutions your question

2016-09-29 08:24:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Shameless character assaination in an election year.


I am not hateful.You already know that.
YOU are the one that is hateful.
You ARE the racist dixiecrat.
get a clue,honey!

I got you good this morning,so now what?

first one-true as all hell.

second one-If we were3 back in the 1950s those christian conservatives I mentioned,including the police,got away with way too much,especially in the South.


The Dems that opposed the Civil Rights act migrated to YOUR Southern Party of today.

Taking me out of context again.You are sick.

2006-08-16 08:06:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

why is it that those that are closeminded, always call others closeminded?

The KKK is CLEARLY a conservative organization in every sense of the word... your mixing the terms "liberal" and "democrat" incorrectly if you have ANY knowledge what so ever of the democratic party...

2006-08-16 08:19:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You seem to forget that the southern democrats were the repuglican pukes that couldn't get elected as repuglicans so they ran as democrats. But what the hey, what is a little tale spreading amongst repukes.

2006-08-16 08:06:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Nah, one voice, one vote nobody of either party speaks for everybody. Be a independent, vote for who you think is the best candidate. Both parties will tell you whatever you want to hear to get your vote then they will vanish from your life until the next election.

2006-08-16 08:13:46 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 1 1

YES!!! And this statement is absolutely the factual truth and the Dimmis and the brain dead liberals can't handle the truth!!!

2006-08-16 08:29:22 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

Don't blame the philosophy for creating some of the idiots who profess to follow its tenets without the least understanding of their meaning.

2006-08-16 08:07:15 · answer #9 · answered by Grist 6 · 0 2

He talks a lot but knows very little.. But isn't this indicative of most far left Libs !?

2006-08-16 08:03:47 · answer #10 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers