English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Absolutely! As bad as you seem to think things are,
I would hate to think how much worse it would be if we didn't have a leader that was willing to continue fighting against those that are responsible for causing these problems.
Right up there with Washington (The American Revolution) Lincoln (The civil War),Wilson (WW 1) Roosevelt (WW2)
Kennedy(the Cuban missile crisis).We have been blessed in this country by having strong leaders in times of great peril.

2006-08-16 08:04:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Gee, by criticizing bush's mistakes you are encouraging the terrorists. You have to accept everything he does, in fact you have to praise everything he does, to be a loyal American who does not want the terrorists to take over America. If you don't want social security privatized, or if you don't like a trillion dollar debt to Communist China, you are a disloyal American who likes terrorists. That is what the Republicans "think", anyway.

2006-08-16 07:55:01 · answer #2 · answered by jxt299 7 · 2 2

that depends on who you are...

there is no telling who would do better at the war issue, the only reason why people are big on bush being the ONLY ONE like he was Obi-Wan Kenobi or something is because no one else was given the opportunity to do anything else ---no one voted bush into the white house, he voted himself in, had his cronies, and their money and behold four more years of the same ol' sh*t...thats why theres guaranteed kickbacks when dick and bush get out of the white house -----they are going to get back money that they have banked with their perspective companies that they have made while they were in office...theres so many things that are variables in this elaborate equation...which is why most people who are bush supporters are angry and frustrated when it comes to THEIR beliefs being challenged... all most can do is come up with some witty retorts or (gasp) name calling using the sticks and stones theory, however, the lives lost cannot be replaced with sticks OR stones

2006-08-16 08:24:58 · answer #3 · answered by rage ( V ) 1 · 0 2

Well, he is who the voters chose.

Now it's time for the voters to realize their mistakes, and elect a Congress then a President who will fix the broken laws and put this country back on its proper direction by respecting our own Constitution.

2006-08-16 07:52:55 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 2

The terrorists were always there.

Youre ignorant to belive that there would be no terrorism in the world if a democrat were in office.

2006-08-16 07:52:56 · answer #5 · answered by smitty031 5 · 3 1

Our deficit is actually 20% better than last year. Check out the link below.
The Constitutuion is largely based on Christian ethics since it was written by those that came here for religion puposes.

2006-08-16 08:03:11 · answer #6 · answered by juicetke 4 · 2 2

Everything you said at the start of the question is false, but yes he is a good president.

2006-08-16 07:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by cashcobra_99 5 · 1 1

And even with 36% approval ratings you can't say the word Impeachment. Nixon is SO jealous!

2006-08-16 08:01:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Type failure into google and see what is listed first.

2006-08-16 08:04:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, he's an idiot.

And I disagree that the voters chose him. He was appointed in both terms. First by the Senate, and second by trickery in voting tactics and voting poll booth tampering.

2006-08-16 07:53:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers