Nope, but did you hear that they might be naming three new planets after they determine what the exact definition of a planet is? True stuff. Check the AP.
2006-08-16 07:22:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by krd12 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There will still be dispute as to whether Pluto is really a true planet. Also, with the name of a moon as a planet, the astronomers may be opening up a whole new can of worms!
2006-08-16 14:24:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but now I have. Thank you for informing me. I will now automatically assume this is true and share this knowledge despite having no reliable sources or being able to make a logical explaination as to how we could have misses the other 3 planets or rocks all these years.
2006-08-16 14:26:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by iMi 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Using the term rock there are roughly a million rocks around our sun.
2006-08-16 14:23:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not true. The IAU is deciding on more planets, but there are no additional planets inside of Earth's orbit.
2006-08-16 14:24:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Search first before you ask it 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you have some kind of link or reference material which contains this incredible information? That would be helpful, otherwise I think it's a load...
2006-08-16 14:41:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by twowords 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can't believe how many people fell for this idiotic question.
Truely the american education system has a LOT to answer for...
2006-08-16 15:27:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Were you that huge rock they discovered?
2006-08-16 14:23:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by sobe50418 1
·
4⤊
0⤋
Your silly
2006-08-16 14:22:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I knew that. And Is that your real picture?
2006-08-16 14:36:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by gilronn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋