How do democrats think we should deal with this war?

Question

I want serious answers. I would like to know what you think is a better approach to the situation

the Iraq war.

Answer 1

We need to do exactly what Bush said was going to happen. We need to turn over the sovereignty to the people of Iraq and start bring troops home or to other nearby assignments that are outside the war zone. I mean, Bush did say "Mission Accomplished". So lets act like that is true.

Answer 2

Wow what a dumb question. It sounds like you think the democrats got us into this situation. Is that how take responsibility for the mess people like you voted us into?

So lets see, how does this work if, you wrecked a country, killed thousands and thousands of thier people- who before we came, they had families, homes, businesses, but now are "insurgent" and we need to keep killing thembecause for some unclear to us, reason, they are realy really pissed off at us...- although were in THIER country- DUH???

And now how would the people (Dems) who DIDN'T start all this "deal" with it?

Thanks a lot...

But the dems will deal with it, just like other wars that were made by the Repuplicans and left for Dems to clean up- take Vietnam and Korea as first examples-

The solution has been on the boards for a couple years now, draw down the troops, encourage more rebuilding- which this administration has been terrible at- (name one major thing rebuilt in the last 6 years...World Trade Center- nope, Afganistan? nope we haven't put one road in since we finished, Iraq ? well we've such a mess going there now, progress is seriously retarded.

GW should NOT have broken up the Baathist armies, and should have IMMEDIATLY secured the boarders of Iraq - for God's sake i don't know why he could not manage to utter some of these basic stratagies to prevent the mess we got now-
but then nobody can make suggestions to Bush, or he will either fire the person or blow it for you somehow or another.

So it's true, you better stay with your question, because it WILL BE the Dems who deal directly this load of crap that W, Dick, Rummy and Rove have created. Too bad we couldn't of spent the trillions on our own country- ah but then Haliburton would have made most of that money- cause the troops really haven't seen much of it.

any more stupid questions?

Answer 3

I am not a Democrat but I think this is the way it should have been done. "The president, instead of making speeches to the American people which should have been made three years ago about where we were, should be on an airplane going to the world capitals insisting that the rest of the world step up to their responsibility, to put collective international pressure on all the parties involved in Iraq to form a consensus government.

Answer 4

What your really asking is how to fixed a botched occupation.

The second question is there is going to be a massive civil war for power whether we are there or not.

do we stay and pick a side, and hence replace saddam with another dictator. or do we stay and let them pick some iran like leader and then overthrow them.

this is a pandoras box.

and i need to think about it more as well staying the course is definitely not the solution.

Answer 5

What war? Do you mean the occupation of Iraq, or do you mean Afghanistan? Getting the hell out of there is a better approach..... ..should it be any more complicated than that? We can't stop them from killing each other, we can't stop bombs from going off, so why are we there?