I am looking for a company that may not exist now, The name is Camelot Commerce Ltd Dewsbury West Yorkshire?

Question

The original address was or still could be Camelot Commerce Ltd, 3K Anchor Bridge Way, Dewsbury. West Yorkshire. WF12 9QS. I would be greatful for any information. regards Retep g

Answer 1

I hope they don't still owe you money because Companies House has no record of them ever having exist - dissolved, renamed or otherwise.

i.e. They may well have been a fake company!

They are/were supposedly a distributor dealing with car etching equipment for security purposes.

The nearest evidence of them is a citation in a court case in Australia, dating back to 1999
(Google "Camelot Commerce" for the links to the case notes)

Presumably this involves a Mr Robert Leech and his wife, cited in the case.


Partial citation:
(Page 6)

5 In August 1994 the Coupers were in Adelaide. While in Adelaide they became aware of an auto etching business being operated by a Mr Robert Leech ("Leech"). Leech operated this business under distribution rights conferred on him by a United Kingdom distributor trading under the name of Camelot Commerce Ltd ("Camelot"). The business was devised as an anti-theft system for installation in motor vehicles. It involved etching unique identifiers or numbers onto all the glass surfaces of motor vehicles. The idea was that the cost of replacing the glassware would serve to deter potential car thieves.

6 During their stay in Adelaide the Coupers met with Leech at a shopping centre where he was demonstrating the system. A lengthy discussion took place between the parties. In the course of this first discussion it was verbally agreed that the Coupers would obtain subdistributorship rights for the Auto Etch system in Western Australia and Victoria. There was no discussion as to what, if any, consideration would pass to Leech in exchange for these rights. However, an arrangement was reached to the effect that the Coupers, through the plaintiff, would purchase all their requirements (such as the etching machines and consumables) through Leech. He, in turn, would then acquire the required supplies from Camelot. The parties also discussed the possibility that the Coupers could acquire the distributorship rights for the states of New South Wales and Queensland after the business had become established in Western Australia. However, at that time, no formal agreement was reached between the parties in relation to the rights for New South Wales and Queensland.

7 In November 1994 the plaintiff commenced operating the business at the Coles store in Maylands. However, it was not until 11 January 1995 that a formal subdistribution agreement was executed between the plaintiff and Leech and his wife Gillian Leech ("the Leeches").

8 Towards the end of 1994 Milton Couper decided to sell his 50 per cent share in the plaintiff as he had financial and health problems. Discussions then took place between the Coupers and a Mr Carl Bell ("Bell") in relation to the sale of a 50 per cent share in the business to Bell and his wife Shelley Anne Bell. Bell and Shelley Anne Bell are, of course, the defendants in the first action. The proposal was that the defendants would purchase Milton Couper's share in the company for $70,000. On 21 December 1994 Milton Couper resigned as director and Philip Couper's wife, Terri Lee-Anne Couper, replaced him as a director. Milton Couper also assigned his shares in the plaintiff to Mrs Couper


Partial citation:
Was the Condition Satisfied?

69 The next question is whether the plaintiff complied with the obligations imposed by the cl 2. It is not an easy task to categorise in juridical terms the status of the subdistributorship rights in Queensland and New South Wales at the relevant time. Two letters were written on 1 May 1995. The third paragraph of one of the letters (Ex 2) says that "[the Leeches] are guaranteed these states, and if someone else becomes interested in these states, [Camelot] will automatically pass these people onto [the Leeches], and you will pass these people onto us". However, in the second paragraph of the other letter (Ex 3) Couper says he believes the Leeches "have been given the rights to Queensland and New South Wales, but [Camelot] is waiting for us to be ready … before he puts it in writing". Both of these letters were signed by the Leeches.

Answer 2

All history previous to the break of day of recent Labour in 1997 ought to be systematically erased from reminiscence. interior the words of Tony Blair " Britain is a youthful multi-cultural us of a". those prophetic words spell the death of all history previous to their arrival and could be viewed interior the academic teachings now occurring interior the faculties.