I just saw this question and most people said Bush/Blair, but I'd like an actual answer, not based soley on current events.
2006-08-16 05:45:50 · 13 answers · asked by BigPappa 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, seriously guys, King Edward III clearly squandered his claim to what is now the US by opressing the people. There is no way GWB is that stupid. I'm really sorry, but nother he has done even remotely resembles this.
2006-08-16 06:24:12 · update #1
King George III of England; through his abuses, he squandered the New World, which became The United States of America. Had he any reason at all, he would have allowed them access to British courts, treated them like British citizens and the revolution would almost certainly not have happened.
Or maybe it was Saddam Hussein for leading his country to near total destruction through his obstinance. He had many choices over the years and blew them all due to megalomania. Throwing out the inspectors was a classic gaffe which led to his downfall; what the heck did he have to hide? What a waste.
Ecuador's new peasant leader is having fun nationalizing things; soon the money will stop flowing and he won't have a clue what to do. After his country heads down the tubes, GWB will look like he had an Ivy League education.
Apparently some people know very little about world leaders "to date". History is full of abominable leaders, far worse than anything GWB would be allowed to do under the US Constitution.
2006-08-16 06:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by n0witrytobeamused 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
first-it's Jerry Ford, and not only was he clumsy, Lyndon Johnson said that -"Jerry Ford is so dumb he can't fart and chew gum at the same time." and "The trouble with Jerry Ford is that he used to play football without a helmet"
Andrew Jackson showed up drunk at his inaugural.
Ulysses S. Grant (1869-1877) more or less stayed drunk his whole time in office.
Warren G. Harding (1921-1923) was not exactly a mental giant
Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) was showing signs of Alzheimer's in his last term
but I'm beginning to think that we have to say it's Richard Nixon (1969-1974). If he had destroyed those tapes, we never would have got him. He is a tragic figure because he brought about hi own downfall
2006-08-16 13:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
George Bush .... hands down.
In the short span of 6 years:
The budget surplus he was handed is now a 400 billion deficit.
Gas prices have MORE than doubled.
Over 2500 man and women, our soldiers, are dead because he misled the US into war.
Over 125,000 Iraqis are dead because of our invasion of their country. Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
George Bush's defense department let Osama go when they had him cornered in Tora Bora.
40 Million citizens are without health insurance. More than any other industrialized nation.
Under his watch, he gave NO BID contracts to companies run or associated with close friends of his administration.
There is over 6 Billion dollars missing and unaccounted for that was supposed to go for Iraq.
George Bush did nothing while the victims of hurricane Katrina lingered for weeks in pure hell....
George Bush was reading My Pet Goat UPSIDE DOWN when the planes hit the world trade center...
We have a moron in the white house. The WORST president, the MOST corrupt president EVER.... Stupidest? His IQ is the lowest of any sitting president....
Thank god he's out in 08.
2006-08-16 12:56:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blair is it as we all know that saftey was all there in England and now since blair is in the downing street you see England is no more safe from Terrorists .
All because He foolishly acted as a servant to the US president and know the large number of enemy of US who can not reach the US as it is farr away from middle east now the terorists want to punish England for what Blair had dome
"Alas England is no more safe" these are the sayings of an old lady at the place of railway bomb blast.
2006-08-16 13:04:28 · answer #4 · answered by rashid_6mehmood 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What criteria do you look for?
Bush is mentioned, not only for his verbal gaffes, but a kind of fuzzy thinking at to what America can accomplish.
What about Mugabe from Zimbabwe, trying to foment a race war between the whites and the blacks?
2006-08-16 12:55:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, ya gotta like Sadly Insane for the title; the moron managed by way of his remarkable miscalculations to totally lunch his country via three major (and losing) wars in a little over 20 years.
2006-08-16 12:52:47 · answer #6 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Alfred E Bush
2006-08-16 13:01:21 · answer #7 · answered by RepublicansAreFookingRetards 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No really Bush is pretty high up there. Blair is just a lackey.
Andrew Jackson is a contender
2006-08-16 12:53:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Bill Clinton did not know what the definition of "is" is...
Seriously, I don't think anyone who has been elected President is "stupid" per se. Sometimes they get bad advice, or are portrayed negatively in the media.
And, many people think anyone who does not agree with them is stupid.
2006-08-16 12:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by Leah 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Got to go with Bush... still can't believe we has someone that inept in the white house.
2006-08-16 13:01:39 · answer #10 · answered by trouthunter 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋