...when the vast majority of GOP "leadership" is composed of draft-dodgers? It is fact. By astounding margins Democratic leadership has served and is certainly the more decorated of the parties. Yet Dems do not support war; the GOP supports war. It is easy to support something one knows nothing about.
How can the GOP justify their outrageous, if not even treasonous, hypocrisy?
And here's a P.S. to all of the morons who still don't get it::::::
Iraq and Saddam never had anything to do with 9-11 and never will.
We invaded Iraq based on false information Bush presented to the senate.
The invasion of Iraq was never justified and is cause for criminal indictments, not the support of Americans.
2006-08-16 04:57:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Get over your biased media opinion. Pretty much every Democrat in office is on record for supporting the war. Do you think they were all so dumb as to have the wool pulled over their eye's? Oh, and wasn't the Democrats in charge during one of the most screwed up military actions in US history, Vietnam? And what about Clinton's handling of Somalia? And let's not forget that a Democrat brought us to within minutes of nuclear war with the Soviet Union.
2006-08-16 05:09:23 · answer #1 · answered by xtowgrunt 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually there were enough grounds to invade Iraq. But not for the reasons stated by the Bush Administration. I think we should have finished what we set out to do in Afghanistan and then invaded Iraq. We should also be bringing about criminial charges against those involved in the Oil-for-Food program.
2006-08-16 05:08:00 · answer #2 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simple. GOP are angels and Sadam are the spawn of the devil. GOP is absolutely good, so GOP can absolutely judge Saddam. Good vs. Evil. Oldest trick in the book, and majority of Americans believed it. Otherwise, W. Bush would not have the second term in office. I knew he was trouble before W. Bush was president. Then again, no one bothered at the time. The whole point is pretty much moot.
2006-08-16 05:07:31 · answer #3 · answered by XReader 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmmm.....are you sure about that? that Reps are filled with draft dodgers? you mean Like Clinton? The info Bush gave to the Congress was from not only our intell but the intell of Israel, France, Britain, Italy, and Russia.....Kerry agreed with it, and voted for the okay to go to war.....and by the way, that makes it so there was no illegal actions taken.....and the fact is that Iraqi government met several times with Al-Qaeda....did they have direct involvement? don't know, but they were helping Al-Qaeda monetarily....treasonous? do you even know what the word means? It is easier to be scared and not do anything about what you know nothing about......and lastly, Polosi, who is the leader of the Dems....never served....just thought I would mention that.....not sure about the rest....Frist did not draft dodge.....Cheney did not draft dodge....Bush was in the national guard...that is not draft dodging.....and you call us morons.....I would call you one...but I am sure that it is just the lack of thinking for yourself.....and knowing what you are saying, if nothing else, deserves to be questioned highly...and not taken at face value
2006-08-16 05:27:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
$$$ Ka Ching $$$
Go big Red Go
2006-08-16 05:20:35 · answer #5 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋