Nope, I totally agree with you...
2006-08-16 03:07:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by coasterjen 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes! They want to control the "disease market:
that is all a cancer patient, or heart disease patient, or
a Psychiatric patient is, they dont want to find a cure...
they want $$$$.
Did you know that drug companies spend the smallest
portion of their income for "research". The majority of it
is spent on marketing and sales.
Also doctors get kickbacks from drug companies if
they push their :white poison:.
Aside from all that, when was the last time they
foudn a cure? They keep telling us there is NO CURE
unitl THEY find it. And yet they ONLY research DRUGS!!
Because they can make $$ from drugs.
I mean they dont even formulate things to even target
the problem. Everyone just says "oh you have bad genes"
yah ok... let the patient feel even more helpless and
more loss of control for their health. Beleive it or not
alternative therapies do work! Mostly the ones
that "boost the immune system" because that
is seriously lacking in all of us.
When this country turns back to a native diet ( see
www.westonaprice.org ) rely on native nutrition
and herbs from the earth. Is the day we will
return to the health we were meant to have.
Native people are the healthiest most resilient
people in the world. And its not their Genes!
2006-08-16 03:13:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes it is terrible to force this sick person to have treatments he does not want. I read about that. I too think what SS is doing is a crime. I place the blame more on the mentality of today's social workers. They think what they learned in school makes them the final authority on every question. And most of them are idiots, insane or sadists.
To change this current social climate requires a total revamping of the thoughts and attitudes of the common citizen. The government is a reflection of the people.
2006-08-16 03:19:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by a_delphic_oracle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have too little to do except make new laws and not remove old useless and senseless ones. It's like the self-important management with memo's about small things and nothing said or done about the real problems that they are coward to address! In a dictatorship they may not have a say, but they have more personal freedom to dig a hole, build a shelter,chastise the youth in manners and behavior, be served and drink a beer on sunday, on and on and so forth.
2006-08-16 03:22:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have been consumed by the government. American people need to get together and fight for our true freedom. the word freedom is used, but not practiced. I am anti government but a great citizen. God is who i answer to and no other. if the Whole President government thing dont like my ways then they can Prosacute a Marter. And they will, because the goverment is for themselves they dont give a flip about nobody else. No government would work for me. we should be able to make our own decisions. But the gov. wont have it unless the americans fight and EB is fighting just to live their own lives. Just trying to get by. One day we will take our lives back. But when?
2006-08-16 03:14:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by sugerglaze28 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, speaking as a parent whose child had cancer, i don't agree. a 16 year old is not an adult. in this situation the government should intervene. it is hard for an adult to make informative choices in situations like these. while i don't usually agree with the govt or social services, i think in this case they are doing the right thing.
2006-08-16 03:09:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by bumblebee 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
A 16 year old is not wise nor mature enough to decide his treatment options.Wisdom comes with age and life experiences.His parents should be the ones who can make the decision.If they say no and he agrees,so be it.Too bad the french govt won't stick their nose in the fight against terrorism,where it needs to be.Does your leader have a hidden agenda?
2006-08-16 03:29:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Elizabeth 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Who's paying for her cancer treatment? If she's receiving government assistance, then they get a say. I know I like having some control over how my money's spent.
She could always pay for it on her own dime.
2006-08-16 03:07:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
People should be allowed to deal with their own health issues their own way. Unless the government wants to start paying for my health insurance, leave me alone.
2006-08-16 03:08:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by d 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No Ma'am! There's a whole bunch of us expat's living out here who don't live there simply because of that fact!
2006-08-16 03:11:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by dn_side_umop 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No you are not. That is why I am against the patriot act! We need our rights back!
2006-08-16 03:06:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by lisapj 3
·
1⤊
0⤋