could the US men on the moon be a hoax?

Question

i watched two documentaries on TV about the moon mission on the discovery and history channels. former NSAA scientists and top scientist said that the moon mission was nothing but a hoax to boast US image and to make the country win the moon race between Russia and other countries. These critics points that it would be impossible for men to travel to the moon because the moon is very fear way from earth but mars it much closer than earth and radiation from the sun and solar system can cause allot of harm. To make things worse, gravity and space rocks would cause the space craft to crash. They asked two important questions. If men had traveled to the moon why haven't men traveled back to the moon or to mars? They said that the technology available at that time were not advanced enough to carry humans to the moon. They pinots out on the moon movie the background were to dark with any stars behind them or a spot of light reflecting from the sun.

i have no idea this question had been asked before

Answer 1

Of course its a hoax and isn't it convenient they just lost all the original footage so no one can ever look at it again ...they couldn't do it with technology then and they still cant today ...

Have a little read

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

The fact that people want to believe it was possible so much doesn't make it so.

Answer 2

Excuse me, but this is a question that is being beat to death, and your grammar is very hard to understand. Are you actually trying to tell me that Mars is closer than the Moon? I don't know the actual figures off hand, but Mars is hundreds of times farther away from the Earth than the moon is. Think about it. Mars is several times larger than the Moon, and it appears as a tiny dot in the sky at night, and the Moon looks huge. I don't feel that the Moon landing was a hoax, and we have returned at least once that I know of. We didn't return anymore after that because NASA had bigger fish to fry. The moon is a boring chunk of rock and dust that offers little in the way of research, so why return there more times.

Answer 3

there is not any telescope large adequate to % out the lunar landers from the Earth (they could might want to be round one hundred m for the era of), and the flags have likely lengthy when you consider that decomposed to dirt, when you consider that they were customary food market nylon flags. inspite of the undeniable fact that, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken some somewhat cool images of the touchdown web pages from above. you'll come across them on the link decrease than. There are different orbiters which have taken pictures of the web pages, e.g. the Indian Chandrayaan a million and the jap SELENE, yet they don't instruct adequate component to make out something a lot. yet another piece of incontrovertible info is the moon rocks. The counter-argument is often that they are merely customary rocks that were baked in a "radiation oven" (inspite of it really is - i'd opt to work out one). Isotope ratios, length of the crystals, micrometeoroid zap pits - all of them factor to them being formed in a million/6 gravity, some billion years in the past, and then being uncovered to photo voltaic and cosmic radiation. so some distance as i recognize, it may be no longer a possibility to recreate a lunar rock without progression it up atom by technique of atom, that could likely be more effective extreme priced than going there in the first position. It remains a undeniable actuality that any geologist properly worth his salt might want to spot a pretend interior minutes, and that the samples back by technique of Apollo quantity to easily about 1/2 a ton. Granted, the russians managed to go back some hundred grams of soil with a robotic project, yet retrieving the Apollo samples by technique of that approach might want to require one launch a week throughout the time of the entire era. you'll imagine someone might want to be conscious. and that is even discounting that we've images of the rocks formerly sequence on the lunar floor, the middle samples, and the huge type that the astronauts were able to collect after being experienced as field observers.

Answer 4

I know when you typed this question, the 1,000,000 times it's been asked before on Yahoo popped up right in front of your eyes.

Continue to be uneducated and believe what you want. There is no doubt that some will believe anything! But boy did you waste your time typing your long, boring dissertation! I took one look at it and barfed.

Redundant. Do you even know what that means?

Answer 5

Moon + Hoax turns up 84 matches

Answer 6

It's important to question, especially when the government is involved, but there is ample credible evidence that the moon landings occurred. I refer you to the following websites.

Answer 7

Yes, it was all a scam. We've never been to the damn moon. We'll be lucky to make it to Mars. Aren't you real proud of the US government? Bunch of liars they are, and have been for many years.

It's time for a REVOLUTION!!!!!

Answer 8

Why is this bloody question coming back every 2 hours now?

Answer 9

yes it is a hoax why did they lose the orginal films of the landing...
?

Answer 10

I dunno what channell your watching. However, take it from a 51 year old (aussie) who watched it at state school. The moon mission realy DID happen. They landed there.