just imagine the sheer size of their population, and probably thats the reason, US is wary of both of them.
2006-08-16 02:12:14 · 22 answers · asked by SUNIL Raj 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No
2006-08-16 02:18:45 · answer #1 · answered by sugarbabe180 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. inspite of the undeniable fact that the headline misconstrues what Vidal reported. Vidal did not recommend lets have a protection stress dictatorship "less than Obama". He reported “We’ll have a protection stress dictatorship quickly, on the theory no one else can carry each thing at the same time". "no one else" refers back to the protection stress, no longer Obama. In previous paragraphs Vidal says Obama is a f*ck up who has actually no information of protection stress concerns and is no longer making use of the ability of the president like Lincoln did and can want to be assassinated. Obama is a civilian. I finish Vidal grow to be concerning a actual coup by technique of the protection stress. it form of feels not likely to me that this may happen "quickly", yet I i doesn't rule it out in the destiny. something else of the quote: "Obama might want to were more effective efficient off focusing on preparation the yank human beings. His difficulty is being overeducated. He doesn’t comprehend how dim-witted and ignorant his target audience is.” Vidal has continually been the epitome of an effete psychological snob. He thinks every person no longer as wise as he's (he's awesome) is a moron.
2016-11-25 20:40:17 · answer #2 · answered by rinaldo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If a situation arises, by which only two nations can survive, it means that these nations will apportion the world among themselves. Will all other nations keep quiet? Can China and India afford to wage a war against all other nations and win it too, in a nuclear scenario. It is an improbable pipe dream of an Indian, who wants to glorify India at any cost. (I am an Indian, myself, But, I am practical, you see.)
2006-08-16 21:11:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
not at all.. considering the population explosion their is bound to be huge problems in starvation and poverty in both countries someday... it will catch up with them in time. The good thing about the United States is that we are growing steadily and are able to keep producing jobs. In 2052 China will have to create over a billion more jobs just to keep the country out of "Poverty".
2006-08-16 06:15:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if there's still an Earth for India and China....by the way humans are treating the Earth (wars, nuclear weapons, global warming, deforestation), I very much doubt that there is going to be Earth around in 100 yrs time.
2006-08-16 02:18:18 · answer #5 · answered by autumn lover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must be joking. There are 193 countries in the world at the moment. Why on earth would there be only two in a hundred years?
2006-08-16 02:19:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no,after 100 more yrs india may be the developed country but other also may be a big one.please consider other 4 continents
2006-08-16 02:21:13 · answer #7 · answered by barani d 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm.. well even if it happened dere wud always be another country to take over.Like 100 yrs back UK and France were the big shots and now US .
2006-08-16 03:55:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.because a day will come when the whole world wl only
depend on India and China only for everything
2006-08-16 02:41:36 · answer #9 · answered by Lalgudi Saptarishi G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, but world powers have only lasted so long throughout history.
2006-08-16 02:18:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its very likely that by then Jesus will be back to fix everything NO I think it could be world peace by then with one government.
2006-08-16 02:17:32 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋