English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's as though there is a universal pressure,beyond our four forces,that tends to push all mass towards other mass.I think it would be the opposite of gravity...tom science

2006-08-15 20:22:35 · 12 answers · asked by tom science 4 in Science & Mathematics Physics

You folks don't quite get the grand picture.I know it's hard to fathom such sizes,yet i truly feel that everything large or small is a sphere.Universal pressure,exerting on all sides of all matter,creating nothing but spherical shapes..........

2006-08-16 02:53:31 · update #1

12 answers

Yes, of course. I want some of what you're having.

2006-08-15 20:27:18 · answer #1 · answered by dbblackman 2 · 0 0

Things can be spherical for several reasons:
- Planets and stars are spherical because gravity pulls parts far from the center down into valleys closer to the center, hence the surface tends to be equally far from the center everywhere. This is the definition of a sphere.
- Water bubbles in the atmosphere are spheric because of the surface tention which minimizes the surface. For a given volume, the surface is the shape that has the smallest surface.
- The universe is often modelled as spherical because the sphere is one of the few shapes that has the same curvature everywhere. Scientists prefer the simple models that can account for observations (a principle known as Occam's Razor) so unless there is evidence to the contrary, the Universe is assumed to have some simple geometry, for example a sphere.

So there's hardly a need for new forces accounting for sphericallity. The already known laws of nature do pretty well. But maybe you can unify the different principles that generate sphericallity> What about becoming the inventor of the Unified Theory of Sphericallity - sounds cool, doesn't it?

2006-08-15 20:46:41 · answer #2 · answered by helene_thygesen 4 · 0 0

i'll argue once you assert that there is not any reason. Radioactive atomic nuclei are volatile and rot in a random trend in step with quantum mechanical possibilities. Nondeterministic applications would return diverse consequences yet volatile nuclei will nevertheless decay. in the event that they weren't volatile, they might not. Simplistic yet uncomplicated and actual. edit someone atom decays because of the fact is volatile. photograph a pile of toddler's blocks can fall devoid of on in the room. curiously to be for "no reason", yet there are nevertheless actual factors at paintings. ie gravity. If we weren't attentive to gravity, the actual regulation might nevertheless be at paintings. it would nevertheless be the reason. to prepare Aquinas' ontological argument with quantum physics continues to be a stretch. statistics are no longer unavoidably a stable gadget, they're some distance to based upon the observer, the pattern pool and interpretation. you're achieving to show a element that isn't there.

2017-01-04 09:31:16 · answer #3 · answered by russnak 3 · 0 0

yes the universe is sphereical because the universe has act's as a magnetic feild , so it contain's two pole south pole and north pole ,so due to the magnetc attraion all the atom's or particle's are curved , i think that this is the main reason for the apperence of earth round and also universe

2006-08-15 21:09:56 · answer #4 · answered by chetan 1 · 0 0

How about the structure of living organisms?

2006-08-15 21:17:48 · answer #5 · answered by Pearlsawme 7 · 0 0

Nope. Anyone who has seen photos of the Andromeda galaxy would not describe it as spherical. Likewise the solar system.

2006-08-15 22:29:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the universe is made of atoms and space-time.

2006-08-15 20:33:05 · answer #7 · answered by Alex S 2 · 0 0

Quantum physics and the string theory may dispute that.....but hey....whatever...

2006-08-15 20:29:50 · answer #8 · answered by Todd's 3 · 0 0

space time is a curved surface, which inplies that it turns onto itself evenually, UNLESS, the end has not yet reached the beginning; in which case your thought is flawed.

My brain 'urts

2006-08-15 20:29:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes u r right. feel better?

2006-08-15 21:33:25 · answer #10 · answered by supraman126 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers