If conservatives claim that attacking Bush strengthens terrorists, then why are conservatives attacking Bush?

Question

Everyone from Michelle Malkin to Fox News are taking a chunk out of George. So have the terrorists won?

http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/08/defeatism-and-attacks-on-commander-in_14.html

Answer 1

Toothpaste is banned & you have to test baby formula before boarding an airplane...

Terrorism is all about injecting fear into your target [ememies]. I'd say the terrorists have already won.

Answer 2

You think that's bad, read this article from a conservative republican magazine. They say Bush sold America out. They say he is opening our borders with Canada and Mexico. This article claims Bush is pushing a globalist agenda (new world order).

This article says that Bush is trying to destroy our unions and give interstate trucking jobs to Mexico. They tear into that traitor Bush big time.

But don't take my word for it, click this link and read away.http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965

And if attacking Bush strengthens terrorists then the conservatives have just handed them the atom bomb

By the way, it was nutcase conservatives who were ripping on Bill Clinton while fighting Bin Laden. Seems like to the nutcase conservatives it's o.k to rip on Clinton, all of a sudden you do it to Bush and it's "strengthening terrorists". That's pretty convenient for Bush wouldn't you say..

Hey Vlad the Imp, nobody said that there wouldn't be any terrorism if Bush wasn't in office. You did but nobody else. If you want to change the subject to take the heat off of Bush that's not gonna cut it.

Answer 3

It's all political debate and nothing more.

But I can't leave it at that...

Rense: So if Bush weren't in power there would be no terrorism? Not big on history are you? Here's some food for thought.

1972 Munich: 11 Israeli athletes were murdered at the Munich Olympics by Islamic terrrorists.

The American hostage crisis in the late 1970s where Iranians kidnapped American embassy workers.

Numerous plane hijackings in the 80s

1993 bombing of the world trade center

Bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen

Do a google search for Islamic Terrorism. Educate yourself so you won't look like a fool this year in school

Answer 4

The terrorists haven't won. The problem is: Bush doesn't seem to get the gist of how to handle this crisis. Do you think that maybe the majority of the population are all mistaken? By the people. For the people. Of the people. It seems that Georgie-Poo does not instill much confidence in the American people. No president works alone. You can blame his advisers too.

Answer 5

How many terrorist killed by Bush on attacking them? all innocents are getting killed. His act of attacking countries done nothing other than strengthening the terrorist.
Let me tell you Bush is biased dealing in terrorist. The best friendly nation of US in south asia is pakistan. Despite all knows that terrorists has all links and in pakistan and supported as well.
Still US has great affection for Pakistan. Just because they don't want to loose it's grip on south asia. Is it not biasness??

Answer 6

No one will agree with all of Bush's policies -- or disagree with all of them. I have no issues with his foreign policy. I have significant issues with his policy on stem cell research. The terrorists haven't won unless we leave Iraq in the hands of terrorists.

Answer 7

Good point... Even republicans seem to be catching on to Bush's idiocy, you can tell by his 33% approval rating...

Answer 8

If Bush were not in power, we wouldn't have any terrorism, you can bank on that!

Answer 9

logical question..lol

but who uses logic in the political world

Answer 10

No, it is just that many conservatives have come to their senses.