Will you please rate my fantasy football team?

Question

QB - P. Manning, T. Green, P. Rivers
RB - W. Parker, R. Bush, F. Taylor
WR - J. Galloway, E. Kennison, K. McCardell, A. Bryant
TE - A. Gates, V. Davis
K - N. Rackers
DEF - Chicago Bears, San DIego Chargers

I would like to trade Trent Green and/or Fred Taylor, for a top notch reciever, and maybe pick up a different 3rd RB.



This is the first time I've done this, so any pointers will be greatly appreciated. Things didn't work out quite the way I wanted in the draft, but that's the way it goes. Anyway, thanks for your time and insight.

This a 10 team Yahoo Public league

Answer 1

I'm basing this on the assumption you have a 10-team league or so:

Your QBs are obviously very solid. You will need Bush to come through big for you to do well at RB. But don't despair - this notion that Bush is going to be getting a half or less of NO's carries because of Deuce McAllister should last about another week or two. If he does come through big, still search the waiver wires in the early weeks to get a backup, because Taylor's no insurance plan. Your WRs are weak - each of your guys is one position ahead on your depth chart than you would ideally like him to be. Your TE, K, and Def situations are all outstanding.

If someone will give you a good WR for Green and/or Taylor, that would be a great trade for you.

Answer 2

QB - You're set with Manning. Green and Rivers are both question marks because the running games in KC and SD are so good. (plus Rivers is inexperienced) Still, I'd stay put with this group.
RB - Could use work. Parker will have goalline carries taken away by Staley. Taylor is quite injury-prone. Bush could be a plus, but might lose goalline carries to McAllister. I'd consider trying to upgrade here, possibly trading Green or Rivers.
WR - Galloway should be solid. Kennison might suffer from the strong KC running game as well as having Tony Gonzalez as the primary option. McCardell will have the same problem with the SD running game and with them having Gates. Not so sure about Bryant; the SF offense was pretty bad last year. Definitely would upgrade.
TE - Good
K - Good
DEF - Good

My advice wouold be try not to have more than one QB-WR tandem from the same team. If your QB has a bad game, so will your WR, lowering your chances of winning.

Answer 3

It's kinda bad actually

first of all QB's are really overated in fantays sports, so peyton is good but not worth as much as he should be.

parker and bush are ok, but they are big question marks, and RB's are the most important position on the team

those recievers are sub par at best, and you won't be able to get anything decent for green and taylor

Gates is good but he will suffer big time without drew brees

Rackers is a good pick

Chicago is a good pick

you might be able to trade gates or bush for something higher in value, but then again either of them could have good seasons

next time screw peyton, and go for RB's first, you can always pick up good qb's like bree's or green in the 5th and 6th round

Answer 4

bush i like that team is very good but if u tell me how many teams are in the league it would be a great help say thats a 10 or 12 team league then thats a very good team id add a wr deal fred taylor and parker for a better rb nice team tho

Answer 5

Try to get a top notch RB.QB's are great. Rivers should have a HUGE year, Manning never dissappoints, Green still has it. Good DEF's. Chargers are a good sleeper canidate. Good luck this season, if u need some help or anything, drop me a message.

Answer 6

try and workout a deal with gates,green,rackers for a good RB
RBs are the most important position in fantasy and you dont have any good ones-id trade bush because people will overrate him-he will be splitting carries with willis mcgahee so he isnt that great-taylor is known as fragile fred in fantasy circles so see what you can get for him-hold onto parker
rackers isnt going to repeat-one of the reasons for his success was the cardinals werent able to get in the end zone in the red zone so they kicked a FG now they got Edgerrin James and Ks dont make a big dif in fantasy-
if you could tradeGates,Bush and Rackers for one of the big 3(LJohnson,LThomlison,SAlexander)u would have a good team-PS hold onto Peyton,the dropoff is huge from him

Answer 7

You have done well for QB, TE, K & DEF. You will more depth at RB and WR either through trades or the waiver wire.

Answer 8

your bench sucks and tampa bay's protection is suspect. you forget they play in the nfc south with carolina and atlanta. seem on the offensive gamers on those team. there's a great style of things they are going to provide up in the those video games. none of your bench gamers are going to do something for you. in line with threat bledsoe. for the main section they are the two coming off injuries or decrease than performers. so your suitable case concern is to desire none of your starters get harm. mcnabb performs in the nfc imperative and doesnt have stable receivers or a first rate back. boldin is sizeable, moss became great, mason wont provide u vast numbers. johnson is sizeable. bush would be great. witten performs in dallas have been terry glenn gets most of the balls and stats. so the starters seem relatively stable.

Answer 9

QB, TE and DEF are ur strong spots, Please trade for a better star reciever, RBs, not bad risky tho, if it works out youll look like a genius, but if it doesnt thatd be bad.

Answer 10

i like it but drop rivers and get greg jones