Cry more..
2006-08-15 15:58:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ballzy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, because if he was doing a "great" job, the troops (or at least most of them) would not still be in Iraq and while more people die everyday. He wants to finish what his dad started-but unfortunately he sucks. I think he has spent most of his time in office on "vacation" in Texas. Even off the topic of Iraq, he has RUINED the education system that I work in everyday. No Child Left Behind is one of the WORST acts for our future generations, so not only is he f*ing up the present but the future as well.
2006-08-15 15:59:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ash_082 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
We havent been attacked since 9/11/01. What about since 9/10/01? Not so good! Next the conservatives will triumphantly tell us that Nixon never created a scandal.... after Watergate.
When the WTC center was bombed while Clinton was pres, the guys who did it were captured, arrested, put on trial, and convicted. Where's Osama?
2006-08-15 15:56:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phil S 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
To try to understand Bush supporters is futile. Each one has their own rationale for continuing to sing his praises. Couldn't be his intellect, because he has made it his cause celebre to keep as much distance between himself and true intelligence as possible, in more ways than one and they think of him as either a good ol' boy, or their President, right or wrong. But, Carl Rove is an evil genious at controlling these less than adequate mentalities by pandering to their prejudices. We can only pray that these poor neo-con doughboys will become pissed off at something neither you or I can predict and stay away from the well-greased voting booths that are being prepared for them by the Republican goon squads accross the country.
2006-08-15 16:23:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consider this, if Bush was doing a good job, would there still be this threat. This war on terror was supposed to crush the threat. Yet 6 years later, we find ourselves a new plot that Britain stoped. If we were really winning, you could tell me where osama is, In a god dam grave in afganistan!!! Bush is a failure and losing his so called war on terror
2006-08-15 15:57:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by splinter 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Boy if Clinton is to blame why did Junior not go after Bin Laden as soon as he was president, maybe he was looking for a Pearl Harbor event to go into Iraq seeing how Junior said that if he had as much capital as his daddy has in GWI he will go into Iraq.
2006-08-15 16:03:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
firstly ..... an relatively massive Hugg To You! A time pill is being set as much as be opened in 250 years pertaining to to the Bush presidency, what's in it? a replica of My puppy Goat, a coke spoon, an empty bottle of scotch, and a thumbed canine/eared replica of Dictatorship for Dummies.
2016-10-02 03:38:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by angelou 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. He is doing a shitty job. Bush has been lucky, that's all. Plus ********** Bush and Co. allowed 9/11 to happen so should be tried for treason. His supporters should be tried for treason too.
2006-08-15 15:55:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Repubs_have_no_balls_or_brains 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hey Bushie-you;re doing a heck of a job.
2006-08-15 16:01:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by jimbo 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Doctor: Why are you always clapping your hands?
Patient: Because that scares elephants
Doctor: But there are no elephants here.
Patient: See?, it works.
2006-08-15 18:43:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you saying that it was a good idea for Clinton to just shake Al Qaida's hands and said "Don't do it again, please," when they tried to bomb the WTC (twice)?
Bush is doing fairly good, but not perfect.
50 times better than that mofo Kerry would have been.
2006-08-15 15:55:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋