Were Nazis against invading foreign countries without probable cause?? Were they HOMOPHOBIC?? Were Nazi's masters of PROPAGANDA, sometime using religion as a justification of murder??
You know, there is an American political party who follows very similiar principles, but I just can't put my finger on which one... ;)
2006-08-15 15:21:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This a response to the countless right wing nutcases comparing liberals to Nazis, communists, satan worshippers, etc.....
Oh you don't think Bush is Homophobic, Jon??
You ever been married Jon???
2006-08-15 15:32:01 · update #1
My goodness, I wonder who? Nazis torture, not at all, friendly persuasion!
A little old lady took her clock to the Nazi clock repair man, because he was very famous for his work. He ask her what the problem is and she replies, "Clocks are so supposed to go tick tock, now this one only goes, tick,tick" Can you fix it?"
Ja, I can fix it , come back tomorrow", he says.
She returns the next day and there is her clock on the counter, going tick tock, tick, tock; delighted she says, "Herr Clockman, how did you fix it so quick?"
Herr Clockman says: "I am a professional, I have vays of making it tock!
2006-08-15 15:38:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Nazis' only cause was to have the perfect German race take over Europe.
The Nazis were certainly very homophobic. They "purged" gay clubs in Berlin and other cities and put up to 600,000 gay men in concentration camps, the 'Pink Triangle'. Men in the camps would be forced into labour, be experimented on (some Nazis, such as Himmler, thought they could "cure" homosexuality) or just wait until they were killed. It really annoys me that everyone thinks the Jews were the only victims of the Holocaust.
Sadly I think Bush would do exactly the same if he thought he could get away with it. I really feel sick...
2006-08-16 07:47:56 · answer #2 · answered by quierounvaquero 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not all nazi's were. Some were forced under loyalty, most were brainwashed, and many prisoners in concentration camps were forced to do the dirty work too.
Even if they went against Hitler, they'd wind up dead, back then many may have figured that everything really was a test of "survival of the fittest." I almost feel kind of bad that former Nazi's had to go into hiding, but then again they let themselves do that, I think I'd rather have died if I made a choice after all, it is their fault too. Hitler didn't start a war alone, people made their decisions, they followed him, and then they faced the consequences.
2006-08-15 22:47:19 · answer #3 · answered by cyn1c4l 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some of you knucklehead Dems continually attribute these traits to the Republicans hoping they'll stick, but you fail to see that most of America doesn't agree with you because they see failure in both parties. Until you Dems begin to see the world as it is outside your social circles you will continue to lose elections.
When you use talk comparing Repubs to Nazis you may strengthen your base, but you lose the middle. And strengthening the base isn't going to help you in the coming elections- your base was going to vote for you anyway- thats why its a BASE. It's the middle you need to worry about.
Just some friendly advice from a Republican. But then, what do I know? All that hate worked so well for you last election.....
2006-08-16 13:19:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I beg of you...and everyone else that reads here to read the 14 Points of Fascism. Yes, many similarities between Nazi actions and Republican Actions as of late. Does that make Republicans Nazis? NO. Does it make them Fascist? Yes.
2006-08-15 22:39:46 · answer #5 · answered by Daniel C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if there was an American political party that were like Nazi's...they wouldn't debate in congress...they'd control the country! To equat the Republican Party with Nazism is like equating the Democrats with Communists...oh wait...bad example.
2006-08-15 22:28:41 · answer #6 · answered by solitas777 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No,Yes, Yes and of course. You make a good point. I think there are plenty of Republicans who would have no problem sending homosexuals to the gas chamber en mass.
2006-08-15 23:35:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you be a little more clear as to what you are comparing here? I have an answer but I'm afraid to say something as you are comparing things that are not defined.
2006-08-15 22:39:18 · answer #8 · answered by ck53166 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who isn't for torture if it will save countless lives? Oh, don't torture the terrorists for valuable information! Let's reward them!
Please elaborate? Are you talking about Chinese water torture which makes someone go insane, or verbal threats? How do you extract information from an Islamofascist? Paddy-cake-Paddy-cake, right?
Dumb degenerate.
It's funny that you say you served, yet you don't really understand what's on the line. We need to know what the torturing terrorists are doing.
It seems like liberals want to rely on stupidity and would rather be tortured by Islamofascists in the end.
2006-08-15 22:27:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Nazi's didn't know about it. Gestapo and the SS liked to torture.
2006-08-15 22:28:11 · answer #10 · answered by da_hammerhead 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋