BECAUSE THEY ARE IGNORANT THAT'S WHY. THEY DON'T KNOW ALL THE FACTS. THEY JUST HATE HIM CAUSE HE'S REPUBLICAN. THAT'S ALL IT IS. AND THEIR NOT CALLED LIBERALS, THEIR CALLED LIBTARDS.
2006-08-18 01:47:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
liberals and democrats never get over the past of loosing elections, therefore they decide to blame things on the republican president. Bush is a good person, its just that some people have major issues. People are aloud to have there own opinions but he is being blamed on national television and in newspaper articles which is not right.The democratic party just cant accept the fact that they lost. if john Kerry won the united states would be so wonder full,NOT! he wouldn't be blamed for anything! the only reason they blame bush is because they are angry about the results of the election.
2006-08-19 07:29:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, he's to blame for a lot. And I could also ask you the same question - "why are people anti-liberal/democrat?" We didn't *do* anything.
Bush controls a lot - he's the president for chrissake. When things he controls aren't dealt with properly, or irresponsibly, etc, people get angry, and with due cause. He's running our country and we have no control over what he does.
Also realize it was an extremely slim margin that he won by. Try checking out the *current* ratings he's got, though. Pretty bad in most areas.
The above is my opinion, WHICH I AM ENTITLED TO, just as you are entitled to your own opinion. It's pretty immature to call everybody who is "anti-bush" stupid/pitiful/retarded. Especially those who are divided by party. This may come as a total shock to you, but there are a number of Republicans I know and am friends with (Liberals too!) who don't agree with what Bush is doing. I know people who disagree with the Democrats on 99% of everything and still don't like Bush. It's really naive and ignorant of you to blame it all on one political party, in addition to calling them names. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion. If you disagree, that's fine, but it's a lot better to do it without caling names and making generalizations...the reason why people are "anti-Bush" is all over the news. Just look around for 5 minutes.
2006-08-15 22:08:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by NightDragon 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
unfortunately it has always been easier to point the finger shout, make fun of and protest people we think make stupid decisions that effect OUR lives instead actually getting up and doing anything about it. there are so many people that hate George Bush that didn't even vote, know nothing about local government and couldn't care less about their political affiliations except it is what their parents were.
so you hate him. what are you personally doing to effect change in this country. everybody can do something. there are enough intelligent resourceful people in this country to get ALL homeless people off the streets, you know homeless people--the ones most us walk by and tell to get a job or ignore while we are on our way to dinner or out shopping making excuses for why it isn't our place to help them. Yet we blame Bush for it. Most people stand outside with picket signs yelling obscenities at the man for sending people in a VOLUNTEER army, many of whom were happy to go oversees and defend your freedom to do ABSOLUTELY nothing about terrorism at all except hold a picket sign while they stood there amidst gunfire, extreme heat, and being far away from family WILLINGLY.
SO YOU HATE THE MAN! Where is YOUR revolution? What to do you do to change this country? How can one man run a country contrary to what everyone thinks he should except we all have been LAZY enough to let him? The constitution says 'We the People..." not "Him the ruler..." He's a president not a king, which means you DO have some say if you exercise it.
Get off the blame game, and fix what you don't like...YOURSELF.One man is not responsible for the actions (or non-action) of over 56 million supposed individuals...
for the record I'm pro-bush and anti-LAZY-POLITCALLY-CHALLENGED WHINERS
2006-08-15 22:55:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by A. K. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's the point. Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with the disasters of 9/11. Bush made every effort to imply that Iraq and Al Qaeda were connected when in fact there wasn't a connection at all. His efforts worked b/c even today you are still duped by it. There hasn't been a single reasonable explanation given to us from Bush about why we should've gone to war with Iraq. No weapons of mass destruction, no connection with 9/11, and as far as a humanitarian effort, we were needed in places such as Sudan much more than Iraq. The cost of fixing Katrina is tiny compared to the cost of the war. The american lives lost to the war are far greater than those lost to the hurricane. Now include the innocent Iraqi lives lost. I highly recommend choosing a different topic when trying to defend Bush. He's got nothing to stand on when it comes to Iraq.
That being said, we need to stay in Iraq until the country is stable. We caused this, we need to take responsibility and fix it.
As far as A.K. is concerned (two answers below mine) there was no terrorism in Iraq until after we began the war. There was an oppressive dictator, but no terrorism. In fact, Hussein wanted nothing to do with the Al Qaeda and they were not welcome in Iraq. Like I said before, there were several countries in a far worse state than Iraq was, so Bush had no legitimate reason for invading Iraq and going there most certainly has not done anything to rid the world of terrorists. If anything, terrorism has risen b/c of it.
Secondly, to address your homelessness problem, over 80% of homeless people in the U.S. suffer from major mental illness. It's this illness that's making them decide to be homeless. And, for instance, in my town we had a government funded program that addressed this issue and was workng beautifully. Your good ole boy Bush cut the funding.
People igoring the facts puts people like him in power so that he can rule like a king. Take for instance his warrantless wiretapping. Completely unconstitutional and not necessary for the safety of this country. Sounds like something a dictator would do.
2006-08-15 22:11:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by afk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
well personally i thought he had potential. but then i heard him talk. the guy has horrible verbal skills. secondly, as far as katrina goes, the response to it was WAY to long. they should have showed up immediatly after. thirdly, i'll admit, our country has yet to see another 9/11. but why is it taking so long to get the group that did it to us. bush wants to rid the world of terrorism. here's a reality check, it will never happen. he cannot stop evil. it will prevail until humans are extinct. the plan is non-exsistent. i hate to sound negative but it's the truth. we get bin laden, and a million others will attack us. it's a cycle that will never end. plus his actions have made the rest of the world hate us. do i like him. not really but i had high hopes. however he is no jfk or theodore roosevelt
2006-08-15 22:09:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by tim e 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because a lot of people don't think we should have gone to war. So they assume that he is a bad person. So basicly, people just don't like the way he runs this country. Some people think that he had a lot of warning, but didn't use it to his advantage. In other words, they think he could have prevented more death.
2006-08-15 22:05:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by football dude 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I respect your beliefs, but could it be that people with opposing views on Bush are just seeing two versions of him on TV? I see an individual who sounds so uneducated and rehearsed it's ridiculous. You can't tell me you don't notice that. I think Bush-lovers see a different version of him like in sci-fi books. (Just my opinion)
2006-08-15 22:10:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sasha 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's the president, he's the person we're supposed to blame for the crumbling country we live in.
2006-08-15 22:01:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Carol R 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ahhhhhh. Some of the brightest words yet spoken here. And from a fellow cajun!!! God Bless you!!
2006-08-15 22:03:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pease read Micheal Moore's 'Dude, Where's My Country'. Even if you hate the guy, please read the book. It will answer your question in detail and it will provide you with some surprising information that you can double check if you doubt it.
2006-08-15 22:05:16
·
answer #11
·
answered by megalomaniac 7
·
1⤊
0⤋