English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After all, a NEOCON was a liberal that supported the military in the 70s.

2006-08-15 14:42:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

I find few conservative capitalists, and zero liberal capitalists. (capitalist meaning in this context an advocate of capitalism) Most are at best proponents of a mixed economy, which is a real pisser, considering the fantastic jump in living standards that real capitalism brought about 100 years ago.

2006-08-15 14:59:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think he'd be considered a "cashier" at the 7-11 owned by his compassionate, caring, victimized middle-Easterner on the corner of 4th and Main.
And have about as much respect from his comrades as such.

Song M: by self-made, does that include marrying into it...just like your friend Kerry? Just curious if that is the only legit way a liberal can become "rich".

2006-08-15 23:32:01 · answer #2 · answered by LastNerveLost 3 · 0 0

Who cares what the radical left thinks? Why did you even pose this question? If you are not a Capitalist, you are a moron.
If you think I'm wrong, go get in line with all those other people trying to escape from the U.S. and into Cuba.

2006-08-15 21:51:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Who do you think the Radical Left is?
Do you think Ned Lamont, the self-made millionaire, represents some kind of Radical Left?

This 'Radical Left' stuff is just more scare tactics from the Republican camp.

2006-08-15 22:21:36 · answer #4 · answered by Song M 2 · 0 1

the military is the liberals we were all democrats our fathers didnt send us to colleges we joined eagerly to fight and die as all our poor and democratic fathers before did its a tradition of america that the rich start wars and the poor die and are maimed and then are scared by them and dont bring up the officer corps being from colleges they are 2 to 12 percent and the folksd in combat in Nam and so on all poor or black and democratic in outlook

2006-08-15 21:50:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

considering how democrats were republicans back in the day and republicans were back in the day then I guess that leaves liberals were slaves back then and oh, wait, they are still slaves today, they just dont know it yet/.....

2006-08-15 21:48:23 · answer #6 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0 1

Of course.

2006-08-15 21:47:49 · answer #7 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 1 0

Sure, if he also wanted to invade other countries, remove protections for the environment, put corporations on welfare, and ignore global warming.

2006-08-15 21:47:42 · answer #8 · answered by Phil S 5 · 0 3

YES!!! You are right on the last statement.

2006-08-15 21:49:58 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1 0

NEOCONS LIKE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE CAPITALISM CARRIED TO IT'S MOST EXTREME FORM WHERE YOU HAVE JUST A HANDFULL OF ZILLIONAIRES AND EVERYBODY ELSE HAS NOTHING AND STARVES TO DEATH.

2006-08-15 21:48:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers