These civilians deaths were "attributed" to the US invasion of Iraq. Some have died by American hands; many have died from terrorism. But the cause of their deaths does not matter to the families who grieve them. They are dead, all the same. And the truth is, that if America wouldn't have invaded Iraq on false pretenses, it's highly likely that most of these 40,000 civilians would still be alive.
For every American Soldier and Iraqi killed, their blood is on the Bush administration's hands
2006-08-15 14:40:51 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
250,000?? Geez was I off the mark. Can you list your sources??
2006-08-15 14:48:04 · update #1
not at all.
bush should be given a public iq test. if it's under 38 he should be shot at dawn...
....he's screwed aint he? :)
2006-08-15 14:48:44 · answer #1 · answered by piquet 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The majority of the people getting killed are Iraq's by Iraqi's. It makes no sense to say the blood is on the presidents hands, that's foolish to say. Weather we are they or not people would be dieing. Look up the history of Iraq, you'll see the what Sadam was up to before we went their.
Yes we may have went there under false pretenses, but cannot just back out and leave it like we did the first time because of a error. Its still better than when Sadam was in power. The surrounding countries do not have to worry about getting invaded or gassed anymore. Its a war, people get hurt or die. What do you think happens? I would worry more about the drunk drivers driving around your street than this.
finding Bin laden is not easy. Your talking about looking for a single guy in a few different countries. To me that seems difficult! We did not fin Sadam right away, or that second guy we just bombed not to long ago. Sadam was hated by a lot of his people and had no power when we went their. Bin laden has the most power, he is their top guy. im sure anyone he runs into helps this guy out anyway they can, making it more difficult.
2006-08-15 14:54:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The invasion of Iraq in March 2003 by technique of U.S.-led marketing campaign forces has been to blame for the demise of a minimum of 250,000 civilians (no longer consisting of particular of Iraq), exhibits a compilitation of clinical analyze and corroborated eyewitness memories. the overall public of those deaths, that are besides those typically predicted from organic causes, ailment and injuries, were between women human beings and children, files a properly-researched study, that were launched by technique of The Lancet medical mag. The rfile in the British mag is depending on the artwork of communities from the Johns Hopkins college and Columbia college in the U.S., and the Al-Mustansiriya college in Baghdad.
2016-11-25 20:07:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just incase nobody ever told you...
In EVERY WAR.. Innocent lives ARE lost! It is just how it is!
We are defending our country from terrorism. We are at war.!!!
Hello do you remember 9/11? What about the subway bombings in the U.K.??
You Libs.. will say & do anything to undermine this war & sell America out .. just cuz you hate Bush...& cuz Kerry is a looser!
Sorry the Tribe has spoken & John F'n Kerry & the whacko Liberal, Commi, Demon cratic Ideals are not what America is about! Get over IT!
Bet you wouldn't be flabbering yer yap trap if it was the U.S who got invaded & lost 40,000 lives from terrorists blowing up our towns! Cuz if John F'n Kerry were elected we WOULD be fighting this war at home! WAKE UP & join reality!
2006-08-15 15:02:38 · answer #4 · answered by Joeysol'lady 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wrong!!!
Number Of Iraqi Civilians Slaughtered In America's War? As Many As 250,000
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In America's War 2601
Cost of America's War in Iraq
$307,017,145,346
2006-08-15 14:44:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'm glad you make excuses for the terrorists.
People that are against the war.
1. Terrorists
2. Countries that harbor and support terrorists
3. Democrats
Hat Tip to John Skerry on the link below. Good link
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
2006-08-15 14:54:03 · answer #6 · answered by John 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The RESPECT Party in the UK wants to have Bush and Blair put on trial in The Hague. I'd totally agree.
2006-08-16 00:24:24 · answer #7 · answered by quierounvaquero 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
I haven't seen you before tonight, but, can you believe the
hatred you've seen from the conserves? I mean, they're
supposed to be Christians, yet, they've got to be the meanest
people on this website.
Thank you for being here.
To Joeysol-lady - why are we bombing all of Iraq when 14 of the
19 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia?
Sadam & his sons were one thing, but what did the whole
country do to deserve distruction?
2006-08-15 15:08:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Apparently you didn't have any problem with the Millions Saddam Killed. I'd rather be killed while my country was fighting for FREEDOM than to die at teh hands of a DICKtator like Saddam because he didn't like the way I walked or simply because I disagreew with him.
2006-08-15 14:52:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well I guess Clinton should be charged with murder, he bombed the hell out of Kocove and killed thousands on his campaign to get Milosevic.
2006-08-15 16:14:04 · answer #10 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. You'll have to find some other fantasy to get the votes in 2008.
2006-08-15 15:23:16 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋