English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Very much so!! If you don't do profiling, on many issues across many statistics, you're throwing away the immense value of statistical research, and that's dumb as sheeiiitttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! God Bless you.

2006-08-15 14:35:17 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 3 0

No, it's one thing that the government already profiles for jobs, and services, but if I was an arabic person and im in a crowded airport and you single me out. I'll be damn if I didn't make a scene. And to the guy who said they should [prosecute] people who visas expire they need to understand that america has oppritunity's that other countries that are poverished because of america "robbing" them and putting every other country in debt. So b4 u decide to discriminate against illegal immigrants think about how all they are trying to do is feed their families and have a better life

2006-08-15 14:46:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Serial kilers are often white males in their 30's or 40's who are balding and had a speech impediment as a child. If there was a serial killer in you neighborhood would you want the police searching everyone equally or focusing on the most likely group while being alert to other posibilities? I suggest the latter.

2006-08-15 14:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by tmkng2001 2 · 0 0

it relatively is no longer purely Obama coming up with those innovations; he has accomplices. they does not be listening to your innovations besides; i think of you're in the sparkling. As on your question, I see NO sense in requiring this degree of indignity just to get on a airplane. and that they are doing a similar to the pilots too! as though the pilot could no longer crash the airplane besides, if s/he had to, with out taking any contraband into the cockpit. There are easily loads of extra advantageous pointers on the thank you to stay away from terrorist assaults than observing all of us bare or groping their privates. Intelligence isn't getting used. it form of feels that intelligence itself is contraband. particularly some the best deterrents are already in place. First and in all probability maximum necessary, nevertheless no person seems to show it, is that passengers won't in any respect returned take a seat passively whilst a airplane is being hijacked. the only reason they did on 9/11 is that throughout previous hijackings, passengers have been continuously spared in the event that they did no longer face up to. Osama bin encumbered ruined that plan for all destiny airplane hijackers. next, of path, the pilots can now lock the cockpit so the intruders can't get in. And the, intelligence-amassing agencies have stepped forward extra advantageous tactics for catching the undesirable adult males before they act. clearly protection tactics would be changing continuously for a protracted time, if only to maintain the undesirable adult males off stability. yet we are able to do with out this form of intrusion. i think of it would even qualify as some sort of international human rights violation. Even in the U.S., whilst electorate have been surveilled upon to the component of tyranny, i do no longer keep in mind listening to that they required this form of tangible intrusion in this form of massive scale.

2016-10-02 03:33:50 · answer #4 · answered by woolf 4 · 0 0

Absolutely not! Do we really think that terrorists are stupid? Do we think that they will simply appear the same to us when they know we're on to them? In every war in modern history, spies have been able to infiltrate the other side, and couldn't do that if they weren't able to blend in. The ones we are "profiling" are not the ones we should be after....

2006-08-15 14:41:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I work in law enforcement. I don't think you discriminate, but you need to focus your assets on what is probable. You wouldn't want people spending lots of money looking for 70 yr old white ladies for terrorist plots.

2006-08-15 14:38:13 · answer #6 · answered by miller1513 2 · 0 0

I never thought I would say this, but, yes. All of the terrorists
were Muslims, ages 17 to 35.
Americans shouldn't have to be inconvenienced because of them.

2006-08-15 14:37:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, the British evidently think so, and we're coming around to it, despite all the crabbing by the ACLU and similar groups.

It is all very well to feign blindness to ethnic differences, so long as it doesn't get you killed in the process.

2006-08-15 14:40:57 · answer #8 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0 0

Of course there should. (If three tall, fat white men were seen leaving a crime scene, why would you search for a skinny black woman?).

But it needs to be managed with a degree of sensitivity. You can't just arrest everyone who is fat, white & male!

2006-08-15 14:36:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. We profile serial killers don't we? Whazza diff?

2006-08-15 14:36:30 · answer #10 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers