English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-15 13:51:23 · 20 answers · asked by togurobros 1 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

They already had a deal for Iranizn oil.

Bush & his cronies wanted oil rights in Iraq as well.

2006-08-15 13:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by please remove me from here 4 · 0 5

Why should we have invaded either? They had nothing to do with 9/11! And the last time Iran attacked the United States was in 1983 when Ronnie was president and they blew up the Marine Barracks in Lebanon!

2006-08-15 21:02:58 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

Its a useless war if the USA invade Iran. Iran hold the keys in many countries in the Middle East Afghanistan , Iraq ,and Lebanon. That will be the end of the USA as the only world power and many nations are working on that issue.

2006-08-15 20:59:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

There is a book titled, "The Bush Dyslexicon" detailing Bush's grammatical gaffes, syntactical shipwrecks, mind-boggling malapropisms and simply dumb comments
I think Bush actually intended to invade Iran, but confused by the similarity in their names
(Iraq almost looks and sounds like Iran), he simply invaded the wrong country. I also believe his advisors were too afraid to tell him that he was making a mistake.

2006-08-15 21:23:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The US should have dropped a bomb on both, and get them to blame each other to start another Iran - Iraq war, and save us the trouble, politicians they don't have a clue..........lol

2006-08-15 21:01:23 · answer #5 · answered by tattie_herbert 6 · 0 0

Because Iraq was already on it's back, waiting to be sat on. American only chooses soft and helpless targets. Remind me: when was the time America went to war against a nation of similar capability?

2006-08-15 21:07:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Strange that we didn't. If this were WWII, it'd be the equivalent of hitting Spain & Italy, while letting Germany off of the hook. I just don't think we have the balls that we had 60 years ago - nor the moral certainty. Nothing being nuked wouldn't wake us up from; if we survive.

2006-08-15 21:50:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

iraq at the time had more terrorists, but believe me iran is next

2006-08-15 20:55:58 · answer #8 · answered by Ah Ha 3 · 2 1

becuse Bush is pretty ignorant , he confuse Saddam with Bin Laden, he didnt actualy know there was a country called Iran. Too many Is confused him
Rememeber he didnt know teh name of the leader of Pakistan...........he is a worry like a toddler with an AK47

2006-08-15 20:58:58 · answer #9 · answered by brinlarrr 5 · 1 2

iraq had it coming first.saddam is the one to answer

2006-08-15 20:58:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers