Does Mahatma Gandhi's contribution ever mentioned in Pakistan's independence struggle from the British?

Question

I have been told that Pakistan history of their independence struggle is totally different from that of India's. Mahatma Gandhi and all Indian leaders are negatively portrayed, only muslim leaders are shown to have contributed postively. Everything is portrayed on the basis of religion...Is this true?

If this is, then this is pathetic since this was never a religious struggle, it later evolved into one after the demand of Pakistan.

I just hate some countries and their religious mentalities; they need to grow up...

Answer 1

The tension between India and Pakistan has nothing to do with land, it has to do with their ideologies. India is predominantly HIndu and Pakistan muslims. History has proven that muslims cannot gel with any other religion since their are brainwashed into believing that all other religions especially Hindus are 'non-believers' whatever the truth is. Muslims all over the world are generally poor in education and other spheres of life. Had it not been for the discovery of Oil, the whole middle east would have been the breeding ground of terrorism which currently is in Pakistan and Afganistan. Its the mentality of muslims that make them backwards / become terrorists and create trouble for the rest of the civilised world. I personally think, world would be a lot peaceful without fundamentalist muslims.

Answer 2

The struggle in India to gain independance from Great Britain had the Hindu and Muslims as allies. The rift between them was more visible after independance when Pakistan decided to part from India. There have been tensions ever since over land.

Answer 3

I heard last night that if you draw a line from Cairo to Bombay on a map you will find every country to have a history or now having major religious problems and either presently at war with a neighbor, in civil war within it's own border or extremely close to either. All of these are religiously influenced and because of that the information on their position is subjective to who tells the story. India has a better global reputation and is presently the worlds largest democracy and is less extreme in their religious tolerance. I agree that countries like Iraq, Iran, Syria and others' have fanatics and presently the Pakistani people harber terrorists (Taliban).

Answer 4

The first President of India was a Muslim.

Muslims of India were Hindu people who struggled to get out of the evil caste system of Hinduism, which is also "purity of race" or racism.

It is interesting that the Hindus of a former British colony called the Muslim minority among them "madinga" after an African tribe who are Muslim, because they considered them traitors to the Indian race, and the Indian Muslims hit back with calling their Hindu "brothers", chamarr, which is the lowest Hindu caste.

I hope this helps you to understand some people.

Answer 5

no