Yes she would because they own her and they know it.
2006-08-15 12:15:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I assume that you are very young, living at home in a "blue" state, and influenced heavily by liberal parents and friends. Your view of the world -- that Democrats are mostly "good" and Republicans are mostly "bad" -- is childishly naive. (Were only the world that simple to understand.) When you get out into the world more and meet people whose views differ from your own, you may wish to adjust your opinions.
As to Ms. Rice: She is a brilliant human being, but she may not be a good candidate for reasons having nothing to do with either race or gender.
2006-08-15 12:45:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Et Z 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you realize what you're even asking? She's a BLACK WOMAN that's Bush's Secretary of State! How can Republicans be sexist or racist with a BLACK WOMAN in one of the highest positions in the country?
Condi in '08 all the way!
(There are also many other races in Bush's cabinet. Look it up.)
2006-08-15 12:21:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I presume your line of argument is that Condi Rice has been such an ineffective screw-up do-no longer something in the Bush administration that we would desire to continuously positioned her able the place she ought to do much less injury? specially i'd believe that, as a results of fact the Vice Presidency has traditionally been a do-no longer something place. She ought to in all probability attend funerals of unknown international leaders and host some dinners with out ruining us of a of america's attractiveness international. What scares me nevertheless is that if human beings decide on yet another moron like W as president than somebody with 0.5-a-strategies like Condi ought to stay with in the footsteps of Dick Cheney and play the area of the puppetmaster. So, enable's positioned her out to pasture the place she belongs.
2016-10-02 03:27:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a very vague accusation. Democrats are known for being to submissive to minorities and women. Shame on you. I know an equal number of both sides fitting your description of one side. There are just as many racsit and sexist people in this world with the Democrats. Al Sharpton hates whites. "Hellary" Clinton, hates men. Al's a racist. Clinton is a sexist. What more do you want?
2006-08-15 12:17:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jason 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Um there are a lot of female AND other races of republicans. It sounds like you're the one that has the problem.
2006-08-15 12:16:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by madbaldscotsman 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
ANYONE who would vote for this Pseudo-puppet idiot needs a lobotomy.....personally, I would ENJOY a race between her and Hillary, just for the entertainment value! what a RUSH!
2006-08-15 12:20:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by emmylou1951 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but she would lose votes because she just doesn't have what it takes as a public personna. She lectures people as if they are stupid, and gives really absurd answers if you read them.
2006-08-15 12:16:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am a Republican you are a bigot and yes I would definitely vote for her
2006-08-15 12:16:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
well anyone who is sexist and racist (against blacks) then I really doubt it.
2006-08-15 12:16:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. She would need the liberal vote, which she won't get.
2006-08-19 05:09:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋