That makes sense because in todays times treason is rewarded. He committed treason in the Iran/Contra scandal and should have spent the rest of his life in prison. When he was asked under oath about his involvement, his answer was, "I don't remember." Oh yeah GREAT PRESIDENT. LOL
Btw, typical brainless republican.. Reagan was declared lame duck in 1984 but you state he was the greatest.
2006-08-15 12:18:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't see why not. He was responsible for overthrowing communism and not declare war over the Soviets and other communist nations. He did a lot of things as president and he made a big improvement in the economy. So it would be pretty good if his face was carved at Mount Rushmore.
2006-08-15 12:18:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by jaythewarthog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Metaphorically conversing, he's already there. The rubble of stone that fell off whilst they carved the present faces trickled down the slope. that's what our financial device did for the time of his trickle down financial plan. the wealthy have been given richer and everybody else became interior the rubble. He signed the invoice deregulating S & L's which cost all individuals, wealthy, damaging, old and youthful approximately $1200.00 each and each whilst the fraudsters like g.w. bush cashed in with S & L scams. His action picture star Wars Missile protection shelter which expenses a fortune is yet to be smart and we are nevertheless figuring out to purchase it. He could have been replaced in his 2d term as he became already stricken by Alzheimer's affliction. He could no longer even undergo in techniques his canine's call. besides the undeniable fact that it relatively did no longer rely via fact he became consistently an performing President. somebody else instructed him what to declare and he pronounced the script like all actor.
2016-11-04 21:39:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just want the drugs you're on... Ronald Raegan the best president of our time????????? LOL
I know republicans hate to see this, but Clinton was way better
2006-08-15 12:20:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Luis T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Ronald Reagan practices acting so he could be good at lying to the country when he became president.
2006-08-15 12:17:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES, but digging the passageway to the tomb is difficult,
and as the Valley of the Kings in Egypt shows, you are
always subject to grave robbers in future Centuries.
2006-08-15 12:16:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by robert g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Joan Quigley should be put there she ran the Raygun White House.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-15 12:20:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by 43 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are a fool. Not Reagan and no one else generally. Another case of not leaving well enough alone.
2006-08-16 03:06:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah we could replace Reagan for FDR
2006-08-15 12:17:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
...my vote would be for Bill Clinton! At least I had money to live and a healthy retirement portfolio while he was in office....been broke ever since Bush became our "leader"....
2006-08-15 12:22:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by emmylou1951 2
·
0⤊
0⤋