English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Court said, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

Given that 1/3 of a century has passed and the level of medical knowledge has increased many times over, should we take another look at Roe v. Wade?

2006-08-15 11:56:56 · 3 answers · asked by SPLATT 7 in Politics & Government Politics

Sorry BB.

Blackmun specifically mentions medicine. So I'm asking about medical knowledge.

There are three kinds of ignorance. I have the first two kinds on different subjects. That is understandable, as we cannot know everything. The third is duplicitous and should not be tolerated.

1. Having never been exposed to the information. For example, I do not know how to speak Urdu. I haven't had the opportunity to learn it.

2. Having the opportunity but not taking it. For example, I do not speak Italian. I could have learned it in school, but chose not to.

3. Faking lack of knowledge. When I don't know something, I admit it. However, I generally don't pretend to not know something I do know.

Which is your ignorance?

2006-08-15 12:06:52 · update #1

Sorry BB.

Blackmun specifically mentions medicine. So I'm asking about medical knowledge.

There are three kinds of ignorance. I have the first two kinds on different subjects. That is understandable, as we cannot know everything. The third is duplicitous and should not be tolerated.

1. Having never been exposed to the information. For example, I do not know how to speak Urdu. I haven't had the opportunity to learn it.

2. Having the opportunity but not taking it. For example, I do not speak Italian. I could have learned it in school, but chose not to.

3. Faking lack of knowledge. When I don't know something, I admit it. However, I generally don't pretend to not know something I do know.

Which is your ignorance?

2006-08-15 12:07:26 · update #2

3 answers

Do you understand that Blackmun's statement is actually telling you that medicine will never be able to answer the question?

What they are saying is that only GOD can decide when exactly an 'independent' life begins; futhermore, there is no humanly way possible for us to ever be able to answer that question. That is where they decided that the decision must be between the woman and her GOD... her choice.

Do you get it?

Blackmun is saying that because of our (man's) lack of knowlege as to what no human could answer(until we have evolved to the point where we are as advanced as the creator), we (all the respective disciplines) would never be able to scientifically prove this one way or the other; therefore, it becomes a privacy issue based on a person's 1st amendment right to her body instead of evolving around when an embryo becomes a person.

2006-08-15 12:01:46 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1 1

Sure it is time for a Reform, but we first need to expose, trial, and dismantle the Illuminati domination on every sphere on our system.

The Occult World Of Commerce : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3648930131443936554&q=

They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...

They are preparing us for 2012, for the New Age, of Relelations, and the return of « God » from Nibiru.

“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.

2006-08-23 08:16:14 · answer #2 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0 0

I am not the slightest bit interested in reviewing what Justice Blackmun said about abortion and any one's medical knowledge of when life begins. I don't care about that, so far as Roe v. Wade is concerned. I am extremely concerned about what Blackmun said about the Constitution. He claimed the Constitution protects the right to have abortions. That much, if not anything else, is a lie and that much needs to be re-examined.

2006-08-15 12:21:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers