10
2006-08-15 11:56:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Angel_Anton 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
10
2006-08-15 12:41:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
2
2006-08-15 11:59:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by serinawilson2001 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
8
2006-08-15 13:52:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Soccerluver22 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm with you on this one, being that you asked the question at the moment that you did, there is a great chance that this question is truly too meaningful for an answer. you see, with the time paradox involved, the actually probobility of this question being asked is immeasurable without a powerful computer doing the work of all equations earthbound for a period equal to the time you have actually lived and experienced life. How can we rate such a thing???
2006-08-15 13:25:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely off the charts.
The bottoms of the charts.
2006-08-15 11:57:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by kae 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
-1
2006-08-15 11:56:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tracie M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh, a 1. It's retarded because it's written by some teeny-bopper looking for attention.
2006-08-15 11:57:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by westernndguy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
2, like the points I get
2006-08-15 11:57:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tough crowd!!! I'll give you a 10 for being happy...
2006-08-15 12:01:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by 345Grasshopper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋