he is an idiot. That in itself wouldn't be too worrying if he was just working in McDonalds, but he is the leader of the most powerful country in the world. That causes major concern to most people and hence they don't particularly like George Bush
2006-08-15 11:55:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
No, actually it is thousands of American lives. I think at last count the death toll of American soldiers killed in Iraq was 2600 and the death of Iraqis is in the tens of thousands. The problem with George Bush is that he lied about the reasons for us going into Iraq in the first place. The reasons he gave kept on changing and even today he still hasn't come clean. All we get from him is the same old same old. He keeps using the same cliches, like stay the course or we can't cut and run but he has absolutely no specific plan for bringing this war to an end.
2006-08-15 12:02:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sicilian Godmother 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush and Republicans have not succeeded in a single national security-related endeavor. Indeed, everything they've done has made America less safe. That other nations maintain a healthy fear of our military might is vital to national security but, too, just as important is that world leaders respect American diplomacy and our leadership. Today, few nations take seriously our threat of force because they know we are bogged down in Iraq. Both North Korea and Iran have made a hobby of thumbing their noses at Bush's threats of force. And it would require a determined Sherlock Holmes-like detective to discover many global leaders who respect either America's diplomatic efforts, or our leadership.
That the United States has lost all respect within the international community cannot be denied. It is humiliating enough that a ranking member of the British government called the President of the United States 'crap', but it is all the more embarrassing and telling when the Chinese envoy tells the United States to 'shut up'.
'''It's better for the U.S. to shut up,' Sha said. 'Keep quiet. It's much, much better.'''
"It is better for the U.S. to shut up"? The President of the United States is "crap"? In what parallel universe do the people of America view the sum total of Bush and Republican national security failures and hear world leaders uttering such disrespectful remarks and still, they arrive at the conclusion that Republicans are strong on national security? For the love of all things good and merciful, on whose watch did 9/11 occur? When it comes to the myth that Republicans are "strong" on national security, what will it take for the American people to realize they've been sold a bill of goods?
2006-08-19 11:14:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pigeon P 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The leader of the most powerful and aggressive country in the world is functionally illiterate. He claims his favourite childhood book was 'The Very Hungry Caterpillar', but that wasn't even published until he was an adult. He's been arrested for possession of coke, and got off because his Dad was ex head of the CIA and a senator.
The man can hardly string a sentance together. Search for 'Bushisms' on the web, there are whole comedy sites devoted to his famous utterings that demonstrate he is not a clear headed, articulate thinker.
He doesn't want to increase efficiency of industry in his country and imagines that countries like Germeny who have strong industry with a corresponding strong environmental policies are somehow wrong. Yet at his multi million dollar Texas ranch, everything is green.
He won the Florida election with the help of his cronies and a legal fiction. He apparently can't answer questions about his own administration and policies on t.v. without being prompted. Either that or he keeps his ciggies in a very odd place.
He was openly contemptuous live on t.v. when he didn't realise he was being filmed.
When defending Guantanamo Bay, he declared all the inmates to be terrorists, even though they hadn't at that point been questioned. Since then over 80% of then have been released without charge. They are kidnapping and drugging people to ship them there. Imagine if that happened to you. Most of them have been handed over by bounty hunters - we have to wonder if people are just settling old scores for money.
The man is a buffoon.
2006-08-15 12:03:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by sarah c 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
For starts, my paycheck in according to increases in the prices
of Everything.
He gave millions to the middle east while cutting off relief to
the Katrina victims.
Everything to him is 9/11, todays problems seem irrelevant
to him.
Corruption is gov. Rewarding those who have done nothing,
like George Tennet.
Stem Cell veto, while being surrounded by children, instead
of the disabled, crippled vets, & others with spinal cord injuries,
who might have been given hope, by the research.
How could I leave out his 'holy' laws, of which I am forced to
follow, yet, I'm not his religion.
And bombing Iraq when 14 of the 15 terrorists were from
Saudi Arabia.
2006-08-15 11:59:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This appears like a style of "questions" the place you're searching for for individuals that consider you, no longer searching for information. What I surely have against Bush is that each and each single situation in this u . s . is worse than the way Clinton left it. it may no longer have been a foul theory in any respect to help the Iraqis. Is that why we went? Is that why Bush pronounced we went? Why no longer help the people in North Korea? Cuba? China? a hundred different international locations the place they have 0 human rights? Is it a three letter observe commencing up with O by utilising any risk? Billions of dollars, sure it incredibly is BILLIONS with a 'B' meant for Iraq's reconstruction have basically disappeared. i comprehend, Bush very surely does not stay on those issues. "Fools who did no longer comprehend to stay out of a battlezone"....How deep of you. yet then you definately weren't in Iraq eating at a eating place the place we theory Hussain basically "would" be, so we Bombed it. certainly, historic previous could have the final observe. yet basically via fact everybody is criticized does not propose that criticism is often unjustified........
2016-11-04 21:37:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is obviously inarticulate and apparently illiterate. I wouldn't trust him to organise a piss-up in a brewery! Does he really know what he's doing? Of course he is also a war-monger and a free-marketeer/capitalist so naturally I have that against him.
I cannot understand why killing people seems such a popular sport. Seems crazy to me. No matter who does it it is just plain WRONG. I'm not at all keen on our PM either - or indeed on many other so-called leaders right around the world. they're all on a power trip and have completely forgotten (if they ever knew - so many are from privileged backgrounds) what it's like to be an ordinary working stiff trying to make ends meet and have a decent life.
2006-08-15 12:13:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pema 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most people would support the war if it was done faster. Wallowing and blundering only lowers the morale of the American people and in the end we have another Vietnam. I know Republicans don't want to hear this, but this is not coming from a Democrat. The war may be good, and it is, but it is not fought in the right way.
2006-08-15 11:56:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well where do I start. He cheated to get into the Whitehouse for starters. He should never have gone into Iraq and when he did he should have had done it on more reliable intellergence. He won't listen to any Global Warming issues especially as America is responsible for around 25% of all pollution.
And finally HE IS A COWBOY do I need to say any more
2006-08-15 12:18:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by triffytraff 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has continually violated the U.S. Constitution, which he swore to uphold.
He lied about his reasons for starting a war, leading to incalculable, unnecessary, and unjust suffering.
He has worked exclusively for the enrichment of his friends, resulting in massive theft that has taken the country from surplus into debt and, therefore, vulnerability.
He has used his power to serve special interests at the expense of the entire world.
He has allowed the torture and degradation of prisoners, putting American soldiers in great danger...and then he praised those at the top who ordered the offenses.
He has put people in prison camps with no charges against them, no access to legal counsel, and no right to trial.
His father landed him a soft spot in the National Guard during Vietnam. He went AWOL, hid his records, and then slandered heroes to serve his own purposes.
He does not value human life or human effort.
2006-08-15 12:07:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by dey 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
1. Everyone is a terrorist apart from him.
2. He's a bad influence on Tony Blair.
3. Look into the Skull and Bones society.
2006-08-15 12:02:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by The Mole 4
·
0⤊
0⤋