How can we have peace in the Middle East without the desturction of one nation or another?

Question

Historically, these "cultural" clashes have ended in one side or the other getting beat down so that they wouldn't do it again. The south in the civil war, Germany/Japan in WW2, Bosnia, and so forth.

I don't really need a history lesson. I pose this question realizing that firsts things first, Israel has to withdrawl from squatter settlements and release prisoners.

Poison speech defending "freedom fighters" or "terrorists" without something constructive will be taken as a no. As will please pity me talk from Israeli sympathisers. I just want to understand if there are any dynamics other than those I stated above. Basically, did I miss something?

So what, and an apology?

Next, no chance for middle east peace if squatting continue, there will undoubtedly be continued war.

Next, I said "freedom fighters" I don't need to understand you prespective, I already get it, and I still disagree...

I always like your answers uncle osbert. Lebanon had been warned by the UN that Hezbollah would cause a problem. I'm not saying they didn't kidnap military to get prisoners freed, BUT Hezbollah did cause a problem.

Answer 1

Let me tell you something here.....Prophet Mohamed [pbuh] told his companions from more than 1400 years that the Muslims will rule the world, and it happened in the middle ages. Then he told them that they will be taken by their money and greed and they will fear death...then they will start to get week then they will be too much but very week and all the other nations will try to harm them"this is what is happening right now". Then he told them about a small group who will remain fighting for their rights in Jerusalem"the Palestinians now" don't care who stands against them"America and Israel" . Then ha said that a great war will be between Muslims and Jews in Palestine and it will end by victory for Muslims and that will only happen when Muslims return to real Islam"Not Bin Laden's Islam of course!"

I guess this is the answer : Israel can never stay on a land it doesn't have the right to take it from its people even if it has all the power in this world.

Answer 2

The Zionist must acknowledge what they did to Palestine and to the Palestinian was wrong. What did the Palestinian do to the Zionist to deserve all this. We are not Germans thank God. We used to live in peace all of us as Palestinians Jews , Christians and Muslims till you showed up and look what you did to all of us wars for the last 60 years and more. we even used to call our Jewish brothers and sisters the old Palestinians that how we valued each other as Palestinians.
We will not banded our dream as the people of the holy land and if you think you can be part of that dream you must dismiss the nightmare of colonial Zionism of the holy land because this land is for all of us thank God for the last 1446 years. As Palestinians Christians , Jews and Muslims we kicked the crusaders for good do not be the new crusaders if you really love the holy land. You
to chose between war and peace. Peace means living to gather side by side. War means living at war with each other forever where many people get killed in the name of statehood.

Answer 3

i've got gotta disagree with this one. looks to me that if Israel have been going to flow down the despotic direction it might have accomplished so already. i'm specific there have been many cases over the final 60 years whilst the militia did no longer consider the elected government yet they have remembered their oath's and persevered. Western impact...sure i'm specific there is a good number of that yet to no longer the element of protecting a central authority on the straight away and narrow direction of democracy. i've got study the specs on the Merkava tank, i'm a tanker by utilising commerce and comprehend slightly touching directly to the situation, and it form of feels to me to be an extremely helpful gadget even no rely if it is not exported by the worldwide. comparable issues could be pronounced touching directly to the Uzi and the Galil attack rifle yet that doesn't detract from the certainty that they are first cost to boot. looks to me that the Israeli government is doing a particularly bang up stable activity. production and export???...properly as I remember the final time I qualified with an M16 rifle here interior the US the ammunition became synthetic by utilising IMI Industries which i think is an 'Israeli' business enterprise. can not respond approximately different customer products, do no longer comprehend that lots approximately them and don't profess to. looks to me that Israel is doing a particularly stable activity of preserving democracy in a factor of the worldwide the place the very observe 'democracy' is particularly much exceptional. i think all of her electorate nevertheless have the main suitable to vote with out knocks on the door at nighttime.

Answer 4

i know you said you didn't need a history lesson, but i need to know what you mean by destruction. we rebuilt japan after we nuked it... and i think in context the bombs were necessary for their surrender.

war is cyclical to a certain degree... i think most of the cultural clashes have been abandoned by stable nations with a lot to lose. i would be astounded if france invaded germany or vice versa, but ww2 represented the last incursion after centuries of trading territory. these cycles seem to have largely ground to a halt. except in the middle east, which has spent the last century changing governments and allies every decade or so.

that is one reason what happened with lebanon freaked me out. the lebanese government had been held up as a sign of hope as recently as last year by our president. but even so, they are not important enough to protect from israel. this demonstrated to the people there what our priorities are like. they are expendable, and so are their cities. that does not give them much hope for diplomacy, it just refreshes and reinvigorates the resistance there that insists we will always side with israel.

i think we have to give them a reason to play by the rules. otherwise i think you are right that they will eventually climax and begin again.

Answer 5

We can't have peace in the middle east. One side constantly rejects the other. Think about it. One side (Islamic fundamentalists) rejects technology and vice for their traditional values and religion. The other side (We'll call them westerners) constantly offers business, technology and the unending attempts to grow markets in places where the Islamic Fundamentalists are the majority. This is a very large disconnect. It results from two completely different ways of thinking and the power manifested in the leaders of each side perpetuates violent acts whether they are terrorist attacks or conventional military operations.

Answer 6

First off "Israel" doesn't HAVE to do anything. So your wrong there. This is simply a clash of three cultures. Persian, Arabaic and Jewish. Two of which have stated "in fact and in public" that they desire the destruction of the third (that one being the Jews). So, until they destroy outright the Jewish nation, they simply won't be happy.

PERIOD.

Don't really give a sh1t whether you like this answer or not, its factual.

Answer 7

There will never be peace in the Middle East that part of the world is too unstable for long term peace

Answer 8

We must kill the evil Islamists in the middle east.

Answer 9

One sure quick way is to pepper the region with nukes.

Answer 10

eh.... I don't think you can...

maybe if you drew a laid a bunch of landmines in the borders between each country/region... like a bunch of DMZs... but that's not very nice...