If you ever watch the news...Donald Rumsfeld talking, Cheyney talking or Bush talking, or your typical NEOCON talking you start to notice similar patterns...
Liberal - "Iraq Had No WMD and the war is a waste"
neocons - "oh well then maybe we should put Saddamn back in power"
Liberal - "Gas is $3.20 now thanks to Bush's war"
neocon - "Oh well the President has nothing to do with gas prices"
Liberal - "Bush is allowing american jobs to get outsourced to India and China and AMERICANS ARE SUFFERING
neocons - "Bush has nothing to do with America losing jobs - that's just globalization"
Liberal - "Its Bush's fault Iraq is a failure"
neocon - "we are making plenty of progress in Iraq and its CLINTON's fault cause Clinton was offered Bin Ladin on a platter and refused"
(How the hell do you know that anyway, based on what evidence?)
Liberal - BUSH LIED TO AMERICA and placed us in a fool's war
neocon - "Its Clinton's fault cause he was getting BJ's instead of..."
2006-08-15 10:50:33 · 19 answers · asked by ? 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
duh, because they are uneducated slobs. And what's worse is the educated ones are stupid too.
2006-08-15 18:04:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Gas costs: I thought you libs' mantra was that "Bushes war" was "blood for oil?" Where's all the oil??? They say it's a shortage that's driving up the prices...
Outsourcing: Shows you have ZERO knowledge of gobal economy
Saddam WAS a threat to the United States. Why did we have numerous U.N. resolutions against him? Also, have you ever heard of the oil-for-food scandal? The WMD you refer to was passed off to Syria...You just wait...
Well anyway, when Saddam Hussein was in power, health care facilities had not been updated in decades. There was no sanitation...trash all over the streets...women were being raped in rape rooms by Saddam and his sons. If people said anything negative about Saddam, they were killed. There were no free elections.
OH yeah, and he gassed and killed hundres of thousands Kurds (his own people). Ah yes, wasn't he a sweetheart?
Once the sectarian violence which is occurring now gets under control, Iraq will be MUCH better off than when Saddam was in power. Do you know what sectarian violence is? The Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds are all Muslim, but different sects. Right now, it's mostly the Sunni & Shiites killing each other.
Well, we can't cut and run with the new Iraqi government in such a fragile state. That would be a disaster... Ahmadinejad (look it up) is just sitting there salivating, waiting for us to leave so HE can have Iraq and rule the Middle East, kill all the Jews, then eventually kill everyone who is not Muslim...That's his dream!
BUSH LIED TO AMERICA: Well, if that's what you think, then I suppose every intelligence agency in the world lied, too...they all said Saddam had WMD...
KEEP TRYIN'!! Learn REAL world facts and events and try again.
2006-08-15 11:10:03 · answer #2 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
These are talking points, rehearsed responses to deflect from the real issues. RNC and other republican operatives send these thru e mail so you will hear them repeated over and over. The sarcasm is designed to gain the support of young, angry whites.
Someone below says "listen to Air America" you will hear the same, by the liberals, therefore liberals are hypocrites and discredited. Air America is comparable to the Rush Limbaugh show. If you were criticising Limbaugh, this would be a valid argument. However, we Democrats are saying that Republican officials are distorting the truth, evading the issues and even lying. It's not a radio or TV pundit speaking, it's our gov't lying to us.. When Rush or Al Franken lie, people can laugh or change the station. When Bush lies, people can die. .
2006-08-15 10:54:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you in principle, but I think you should tone it down a bit. What I have learned about deealing with Republicans is that they rightly see Democrats as being just as sleazy and corrupt. Everyone I talked to that voted for Bush was really voting against Kerry. Honestly, I think this argument has to shift away from liberal v. conservative, republican v. democrat, ect. That is just a smokescreen so that the American people feel like they have a choice when BOTH parties sell out the American people to the truely wealthy elite who pay for their campaigns and tv spots. The other 98% of us can argue until we are blue in the face that it matters which party the next President is from, its not going to keep whoever it is from letting the corporations that got him/her elected write whatever legislation they want.
2006-08-15 11:03:53 · answer #4 · answered by Jared H 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ok, we found wmd, over 500 weapons, degraded but still WMD. Also, we know he had them cause we sold them to him.
gas prices are being raised by oil companies who are making excuses to raise it, while also making record profits. Bush is pres of the USA not Exxon or BP.
Jobs are being run off because when you give them tax breaks to stay dems ***** and block the vote with filibuster and claim "the rich get richer etc."
The war is a failure? News to the guys fighting there. our goal was to remove Saddam from power...where is he now? Nuff said.
He didn't lie. Saddam signed a legal binding cease-fire agreement (not a peace treaty) after the 1st gulf war, then he broke his word and we once again inserted our Uncle Sam sized boot into his ***.
There's your non sarcastic answers, and you still will not accept them because ...well I dunno. Libs just never do.
2006-08-15 11:08:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
it is authentic Me and my fellow top wingers are plotting to hijack yahoo solutions from it relatively is laptop hosts to stress liberals into believing that The great top wing conspiracy. Plus to tutor lack of understanding. i like the way you view unfastened speech. Cool if it applies to you, heaven forbid in case you face dissent. you basically tutor us which you're a common Liberal unfastened speech for thee yet you deny me that individual same top.
2016-11-04 21:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we are smart and actually have evidence and reasons for our arguments. Liberals just slander and give some huge sweeping reason like: "I hate George Bush because people are dying in Iraq." or "Christians want to brainwash everyone." You are a loser.
2006-08-15 10:56:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Remember "GRAVITAS" back during the elections...Dems on every station and interview spouting a word some didn't even know the meaning to...it is a political message they are getting out dumbs##t. It's not one side or the other it is all sides trying to get their message out before the 8pm sit coms come on
2006-08-15 10:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by Cadman1965 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Consider the source.
2006-08-15 10:54:14 · answer #9 · answered by sassyk 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am not answering I just like the phrase right wing warhawk. I am gonna use it!
2006-08-15 11:51:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do liberal tree hugging left wing socialists get so offended by a sense of humor?
2006-08-15 10:56:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋