English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here is the absolute incontravertable proof, with explanations

http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm

2006-08-15 10:44:35 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

20 answers

Proof? Thanks for the laugh.

Although my wife's father performed fuel calculations for the original Apollo landing, I'll spare you that speech. Instead, I will encourage you to watch two programs. The first show is called Conspiracy Moon Landing that it currently showing on the National Geographic Channel and it pretty much obliterates all of the popular conspiracy theories.

I would also encourage you to watch a movie called Capricorn One. Made it 1978, it is a fictional story about a fake mission to Mars. Although it is a science fiction story, it is a good example of how utterly impossible it would be to fake a moon landing for any length of time.

12 men walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972 and we have neither the resources nor the technology to pull off that big of a hoax for so long. Hundreds of thousands of people have worked on the space program. It would be far easier to put someone on the moon than to try and fake it and keep it secret for nearly 40 years.

The landings came at a time when our space program was ultra competitive with the former Soviet Union. Remember how big of a deal it was when Sputnik was put into orbit? They had the technology to monitor our moon shots and transmissions. Don't you think they would have called us out if they had evidence that it was all fake?

Perhaps the most definitive proof of our trip to the moon is what we left behind. For the last 35+ years, scientists have been beaming lasers to the moon and measuring the return times. How are they doing this? The beams are reflected back by equipment left on the moon on at 3 different locations.

Case closed.

2006-08-15 18:17:37 · answer #1 · answered by Carl 7 · 1 1

It takes an absolut idiot to even think the moon landings were faked. The whole American space program was open to public scrutiny. The technology to produce the images that came live from the moon did not exist in any way other than to be real. There is absolutely no real evidence proving the moon landings fake, none can exist, it is only lunatic theories suggested by idiots wanting their 15 minutes of fame and repeated by fools who do not know any better.

2006-08-18 11:58:59 · answer #2 · answered by tom5551 3 · 1 1

Ok, so if the Moon landings and all those trips to the Space Station are FAKE; then we know without a doubt that Jesus is a fraud.

2006-08-15 23:32:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I know an easy way to really find out if it was or not, get a powerful enough telescope to see the landing site itself and see if anything is there for yourself. Does anyone have a telescope and actually done this?

2006-08-15 11:10:47 · answer #4 · answered by Stan S 1 · 0 1

Haha... LMAO man...

Hadn't seen that site yet!

Apparently none of these people get the joke...

And "soulrider" is a blatant liar... There is no way to see anything left behind on the Moon using ANY ground or space-based telescope... unless of course you were trippin', then you could see aliens too!

2006-08-15 10:51:54 · answer #5 · answered by AresIV 4 · 0 1

Right up there with George Bush's involvement with 9/11 and the WICCA letters.

2006-08-15 10:57:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Of course they were! Everyone knows the moon is made of green cheese!

2006-08-15 10:52:59 · answer #7 · answered by JetDoc 7 · 0 0

Before you start believing stuff that is unsupported by evidence, you should really understand conspiracy theory. Examine why other people believe things like this and honestly ask yourself if it could applies to this idea.

2006-08-15 10:50:35 · answer #8 · answered by Tom D 4 · 0 0

Please notice this site is a parody... those weren't the REAL
pictures.

Amazing isn't it how some folks will buy the "stuffucanuse" kind of argument somehow not seeing the (poor) attempt at humor.

2006-08-15 11:02:32 · answer #9 · answered by birchardvilleobservatory 7 · 0 0

If you believe this, particularly the authenticity of the "NASA photos", I truely feel sorry for you.

2006-08-15 13:07:44 · answer #10 · answered by John W 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers