English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since Hezbollah and Lebanon are the poor victims due to the Israeli invasion and it was okay for them to launch 4,000 rockets at Israel, it would then be ok for the US to stop the invasion of millions of illegal immigrants from mexico by firing 150-200 rockets a day at them? thousands of murders, assaults, and rapes have occurred in the US throughout the last 25 yrs committed by illegal immigrants? self defense?

2006-08-15 10:26:49 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Brandon....talk about stupid...i am agreeing with u in my question and you call me "stupid" and "********". You must be a friggin retard b/c you cant comprehend "sarcasm" like everyone else who answered this question DUMBASS

2006-08-15 10:34:20 · update #1

Hey Koo Koo Poo Poo...ignorance?? your disputing the facts that thousands of murders, rapes, and assualts have not occurred by illegal immigrants? Marasalvatrucha? X3 surenos? 18th st ...those are just 3 individual gangs that have caused terror in the US...mostly started by illegals and then spread to their offspring...so watch who you call ignorant homie, when u born and raised in california this is soemthing you arent ignorant about

2006-08-15 10:40:47 · update #2

TeaBagger or i mean TeaToner.....physcopath??? never heard of that word....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ....i think you meant psychopath....but hey i can spell correctly so makes me feel 1/2 way sane.......TeaBagger why is it that Hezbollah is a "defender" by firing 4000 rockets and that if US did the same thing against an invading force like mexican illegas it wouldnt be seen as "defenders"?

2006-08-15 11:14:20 · update #3

Inatuk.......mi padres son de mexico pero yo soy nacido aqui en el EEUU, pero sabes que mis padres llegaron LEGALMENTE con todo sus papeles en orden, entonces chingate puto me lo pelas pinche pendejo. Dont worry i know your not bilingual.....they dont have to fire 4,000 missles at my country b/c they have already killed, raped,assualted, molested, vehicular manslaughter, thousands of people in my country. They have created LARGE criminal and drug trading gangs throughout my country. They have the highest rate of any ethnicicty in DUI cases, they have invaded my country with any criminal background check, they have invaded my country's hospitals, schools, neighborhoods, etc....sounds like what Israel does to Hezbollah and Lebanon so whats the difference? why is it okay for Hezbollah and not USA? is Hezbollah allowed to be racist?is Palestinians allowed to be racists? why those bashing me and calling me racist not call them racist?

2006-08-15 11:21:15 · update #4

31 answers

They should deport you back to where you came from. You are not a true American. My dad's an illegal immigrant, and yeah, he's gotten two DUI's since he's been here. Yeah, so he murdered a few guys, but they deserved it. He's still has more rights than you, even though he is not an American citizen. Your question is culturally biased. Why would we bomb Mexico. They are my friends. What did Mexicans ever do to you? I think you are a bigot. So am I. Let's have lunch.

2006-08-16 07:59:57 · answer #1 · answered by Ice 4 · 2 0

There are a lot of people here would would love to launch missiles at Mexico. Our Minutemen could come back home then. So you will get a lot of agreement from those who want to try killing first.

Look, it's not like the US has tried other methods of stopping illegal immigration. Other humane methods such as making everyone have a tamper resistant ID card and requiring employers to check it or face severe fines? Pumping up the economy of Mexico a little, helping ourselves and our neighbors? This could be done in a lot of different ways that would not cost the taxpayer. But solving a complex problem is complex. Building a wall, harassing people, etc. is easy. Except that these easy solutions never work, they make things worse and eventually you have to pay the price.

2006-08-15 10:30:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Absolutely! However after we launched we would need groups of liberals from all over the country to protest it. Then we can 'have our cake and eat it too.' We would essentially be able to bomb our target, eliviate a problem (illegal immigration), and make it look like our citizens 'never wanted it to happen', thus all blame be placed onto the executive branch. Moreover, the executive branch is already responsible for an 'unjust' war so no one in the world would really be suprised by it.

2006-08-15 10:35:05 · answer #3 · answered by Tri-Lambs 2 · 2 0

it doesn't BE A WW3 except each and each of the UN international places JOINS in the conflict! anticipate China to imagine about their economic trades with th US and being a communist us of a alongside with their neighbor North Korea. If North Korea sends a missile in course of the US it's going to be shot down. If it heads to Russia it would want to also be shot down. yet when it hits both Hawaii or South Korea the US might want to retaliate with protection stress strive against. And we by technique of a few distance has the 2d best protection stress even inspite of the undeniable fact that we've our troops scattered all around the middle East. If we mandatory more effective troops the UN might want to help us out. international places might want to comprise the united kingdom, South Korea, and Japan(even inspite of the undeniable fact that they technically have a protection stress). yet probably right here international places might want to target to assist Canada, France, and Russia. and evidently China will attempt to barter and calm each thing down the suited they could yet they gained't bypass to conflict with both counrties they're saving their troops in case of a protection stress protection. yet we do not desire help, yet when we strive against this conflict on my own we will be spending the quantity of funds into the thousands of billions. All i desire is for the US to convey back "THE DRAFT" we'd want to demolish North Korea. Plus even even as Kim Jong Il dies his 26 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous son Kim Jong Un "The Prince" will take over because the recent chief and that i heard this newborn is as vicious as his dad and chilly hearted like him too.

2016-11-25 19:46:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Absolutely no!!! The people in the United states of America are for peace. We do not want to become terrorists like the other countries.There are better ways of handling immigration, such as punishing any business that hires them. They need to have them pay a heavy fine and possibly face prison for hiring illegals.

2006-08-15 10:38:34 · answer #5 · answered by mandm 5 · 0 2

You 're a racist..... Maybe Mexico should launch 4,000 missiles at your country! I think this would be so fun! Just to put yourselves in other peoples' position when you slaughter them...
I would really enjoy that; seeing the USA completely destroyed! Just like you've been exterminating other countries since America was discovered....600 years now you do nothing but KILL................

2006-08-15 11:11:34 · answer #6 · answered by inatuk 4 · 0 2

FOR ALL THE IMMIGRATION LOVERS READ THIS.

DEA agents bust coast-to-coast heroin ring that offered home delivery
By Associated Press
Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - Updated: 03:17 PM EST

WASHINGTON - Federal agents arrested more than 130 alleged drug traffickers from coast-to-coast Tuesday who U.S. officials said smuggled heroin from Mexico and offered phone-up home delivery like a takeout pizza shop.

Beginning before dawn, Drug Enforcement Administration agents conducted arrest raids and searches, seeking up to 150 people, about half of them illegal aliens, according to senior drug enforcement officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity before the official announcement.



By early afternoon, the investigation had produced 131 arrests in 15 cities, from Charleston, S.C., to Los Angeles, based on 10 federal indictments and state charges, the officials said.

Known as Operation Black Gold Rush, the investigation was being described at an afternoon news conference here by Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher and deputy DEA administrator Michele Leonhart.

Officials gave this account of how the ring operated:

The ring grew its own poppies and refined them in Mexico and smuggled an unusually pure variety of black tar heroin across the U.S.-Mexican border, mostly in Arizona, with couriers on foot or in vehicles. Mexican black tar heroin, a dark and sticky substance, is usually only about 30-40 percent pure, well below the purity of Colombian heroin. But among the more than 37 pounds of heroin seized in this case, some was 85 percent pure, officials said.

Among other marketing strategies, the gang preyed on recovering heroin addicts. It sent street dealers out from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. and operated outside methadone clinics where addicts receive treatment.

Packaging a quarter to half a gram of heroin in balloons for convenience, the dealers would offer addicts two free balloons if they bought two balloons.

More sophisticated techniques were available for trusted clients. Agents conducted surveillance that showed the gang distributed telephone numbers clients could call. At first a courier would be sent to deliver the heroin to the customer in a car in parking lot, but later after several sales, clients could call and order delivery of heroin to the front door of their home.

Couriers bringing money back to Mexico were told to buy a clunker vehicle and stash cash throughout its body, drive across the border, then gather the cash and dump the vehicle.

Agents seized more than $380,000 in cash that constituted illegal profits from the operation, $260,000 of it before Tuesday.

The federal investigation began last November after a single heroin seizure and, in cooperation with state and local police, Tuesday’s raids were designed to take down the ring’s entire U.S. distribution system from regional sales directors down to street-level dealers. No arrests were made in Mexico, the officials said, but the investigation is continuing.

The investigation was conducted in Nashville, Memphis and Knoxville, Tenn.; Indianapolis; Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; Denver, Los Angeles and Riverside, Calif.; Charlotte, N.C.; Columbia, Greenville, Charleston and Florence, S. C. and Phoenix, Ariz.

HOWS THAT FOR THE GREAT MEXICAN INVATION.

2006-08-15 10:33:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Sorry, it's not okay.

It would be okay for the US to launch 4000 missiles onto the US side... but not a good idea.

2006-08-15 11:32:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

LOL. Great question! It would be nice if we could get rid of that treaty that prevents us from claiming new territory.

2006-08-15 11:08:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Why go low profile if we can go for the real thing!! Just drop a couple of atomic bombs --one in the D.F. and another one in Tijuana. That would be nice, wouldn't it? By the way, are you in drugs buddy?

2006-08-15 10:36:20 · answer #10 · answered by David A 1 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers