Doubt there is too much that can be done. Americans don't seem to care about anything, and even if something could be done, they would refuse to do it. That is the reason Bush is in office in the first place. People want to divert their attention so they dont have to worry about finding any real solutions, and he is very good at distracting people and diverting their attention.
Anyway, the problems that have been created in the last six years are so great that we have not only not made any tangible progress, but our issues have have destroyed our economy, our unified national spirit, our international relations, and increased problems domestically with education, poverty, crime, and other issues.
If you really want to try to fix it, make people care about real problems, rather than "threats" from weak foreign dictators and "moral" issues. But I am pretty sure by this point that is impossible. Not to be a downer, but I think the time for solving those problems has come and gone.
2006-08-15 10:35:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by aroybal854 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope you realize that if you end deficit spending completely, you end the market for treasurys- a market many pension plans (and the jobs they create) depend on. As for your interpretation of the Bush administration, I recall the same questions being asked when the economy began to TANK under Clinton, and we have somewhat recovered from that. So to answer your question- what can be done? The same thing we have been doing, letting businesses create jobs through proper taxes and incentives and educating the youth in science and math- not diversity.
2006-08-15 10:06:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i really opt to have something good to assert. I voted for the guy because i could not vote for Kerry, yet I by no skill sense constructive anymore about any presidential applicants. He offered our ports to China and that i visit't verify out the constructive there. i imagine he meant properly without newborn left behind and that i'm constructive it wasn't his theory, yet that doesn't look operating, definite the tax ingredient is sweet, inspite of the undeniable fact that it in uncomplicated words helps a symptom, no longer the project. He has made me snigger on numerous activities. i wager thats good, for a lovable uncle type. Sorry, I do hate partial beginning abortion, its so tousled i visit't even fathom the way it exists, yet George merely sounds like he hangs out and does what he's advised now. I loved in his first time period how he were given an rather good type of recent jobs going!!
2016-11-25 19:44:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by cromlish 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first thing we can do is this November by electing a Democratic Congress. Then, in 2008, we can elect a Democratic President who will be able to work with the Democratic Congress. It won't be something that will happen overnight - it will take years, but the first step will be in sweeping the Republicans out with the trash where they belong and installing some forward-thinking progressive Democrats who care more about the country than they do their rich friends and themselves.
2006-08-15 10:56:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm still trying to figure out how we'll recover from the Reagan years!
He is forcing me to retire at age 67 or possibly 72!
That was Reagan's legacy!
He also let 12 million Illegal immigrants into the country on a one time deal and NOW they want to do it again!
2006-08-15 10:03:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One way to recover is put a democrat in office to remind everyone that its wasn't as bad as the media and the left wing made it out to be during the good ole Bush years.
2006-08-15 10:04:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You mean Bush, Clinton, Bush.
Why not add Rice or H Clinton or Lieberman or Kerry.
Who out there is not just a tennis ball. How bout Chuck Hagel, he could be bright orange. Tennis anyone!?
2006-08-16 03:35:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We can all hope that there will be a revolution, and the republican party will be wiped out.
But then it would be replaced by a similar party, but at least they would have the shame of having to change their party name.
2006-08-15 10:04:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by DebnFodz 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The same way it did after Clinton.
2006-08-15 10:06:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The USA will recover quick , when the Americans decide they need to.
2006-08-15 10:03:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Zen 4
·
0⤊
1⤋