The answer to your question is Globalization. Bush has no say and no major affect for out sourcing the entire Westernized world is having a problem with this. Look at Germany, England, South Korea they are all have the same problem. Its globalization not the president although many uninformed people like to blame it on Bush
2006-08-15 09:54:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ski_Bum 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
I am not a bush supporter, but I did study business for several years, along with some of my many other interests. My goal was to become a "baby capitalist". Today, I have to much of a heart to be able to enthusiastically take part, in this activity: at the very least, I can not enjoy it.
Globalization does not just happen, it is helped along, by certain administrations, sometimes with military force. The goal is to get the absolute cheapest price for raw materials and labor as possible for the benefit of capitalist, at the expense of the people and the land (environment).
See this video on globalization. Warning: be ready for a rude awakening.
http://tvnewslies.org/html/terrorism__globalism_and_consp.html
2006-08-16 09:18:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe_Pardy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Industrialist for years have reinvested in their respected business. Machinery, insurance cost, retirement etc..... The unions for years have made demands of these job creators. As the American worker demands more money annually the cost of everything will rise. Is it right that because the worker now has taken on more than the necessary debt that consumers accrue the added expenditure? Raises are requested as entitlements some times. Your employer should not have to support your "need of cell phones, cable television, a boat, etc.... We believe that employers should pay for our health. We are at home a majority of the day. This is like a grocery store charging it's customers to park while they shop.... Outsourcing will eventually re balance the wage earning scale. Outsourcing is a way to lessen the bargaining power that Americans feel entitled too.
2006-08-15 10:02:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ronfschmidt 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm a conservative - and that i did no longer pass any physic's instructions. rather, I took extremely some physic's instructions, i'm an engineer. you're proper, JP kerosene won't soften iron (or structural metallic) decrease than standard circumstances. although, in case you had studied even common metallurgy, you would be responsive to that structural metallic losses 50% of its capability at approximately 1100 ranges F. The periodic table has little to do with this certainty. for this reason the metallic is insulated for the duration of and after preliminary shape - to guard it from the warmth ought to a hearth injury out. This insulation became needless to say broken while the 1st plane slammed in the time of the completed width of the development (watch the video). as far as physics is going, study up slightly on the form between static loading and instant effect. Thirty flooring slamming down on a a great deal weakened and broken sub shape, working example. Case closed.
2016-12-14 06:20:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The mass exportation of jobs began during the clinton years. 1997 was when this activity sharply increased on through to today. So obviously Clinton supported it too. We are in a global economy. You obviously want affordable goods (thus the huge success of stores like walmart, home depot, and others). We also have seen jobs come to the US too. Mercedes, BMW, Toyota, Mitsubishi. It's not as balanced as I would like.
2006-08-15 10:00:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do support Bush, But I don't support this Idea any more than I supported Clinton, or Carter when they were doing it as well. Carter started it when he allowed the steel mills to close and move to Japan, deregulating industries was the beginning that was a Carter thing, it was a Democrat thing that has been blamed on Every admin. since except Clinton but we all know the extent of white washing He did.
2006-08-15 09:57:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am not a bush supporter but i also believe exporting / outsourcing can have it's plus sides for the economy. By move most of the jobs oversea organizations can drastically lower the operating costs typically associated with developing new business initiatives, so in essence they can try out more new stuff in the states and see which one of them works better. In the long run, i definitely do think outsourcing has it's economic potentials.
2006-08-15 09:55:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by rei 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Outsourcing jobs has an immediate negative impact on a local area, but in the long run outsourcing often creates more jobs in the US. Companies outsource because it is cheaper to hire people and produce the product in some other countries. If they don't outsource, many companies would be forced to cut production and therefore cut jobs anyway. The outsourcing provides more profits and then allows for more jobs to be created, both overseas and in the US.
2006-08-15 10:02:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by royalrunner400 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton supported NAFTA, which is a miserable failure, and did nothing to encourage energy independace. Bush is an idiot too about globaliztion & energy.
2006-08-15 10:26:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jobs that are "exported" tend to be lower paying and when they are export the US tends to bring in more high paying that are not as physically demanding. Basically you give up poor jobs and in the future get better jobs in return.
2006-08-15 09:55:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by S. Leroy 3
·
1⤊
2⤋