I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him. How could Americans vote in someone who is so obviuolsy mentally handicapped? Obviously he doesn't realise where he is, what he is doing or why.
2006-08-15 09:49:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Millsy 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't "hate" Bush. I strongly disagree with his policies. Or his lack thereof. He has had some good ideas, especially about Social Security. It's the way he implements them that scares me. It's the fact that he doesn't actually understand the issues that gets me. If it's more than two pages, he won't read it. He claims that this is a perilous and danderous time, yet he's always going back to Crawford to relax. If it were me, screw vacations, this is war.
His policies reward the incompetent and big business. Paulk Wolfowitz was given the post of the Head of the World Bank, though the transitional government he headed in Iraq was wrought with fraud. Over a billion dollars is still unaccounted for from his time.
Anyone who's spoken out against the invasion or the planning of the invasion has been squeezed out.
I think Bush would have been a decent President at some other time, but he just isn't up to the tasks facing him. I give him pops for doing what he thinks is right and for standing by his decisions, but at the same time, he has to admit that he made mistakes.
2006-08-15 16:56:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. It is sad that so many people hate the most powerful man in the world. He could have done so much good yet he has taken the side of Satan. Blair is the same but has very little power only attached to Bush's ar**.
2006-08-15 16:52:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by deadly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thank you for your honesty. I suspected a good number of you out there in left field just hate him because he exists. I don't think it would matter if he woke up tomorrow morning and decided that all of your positions were correct and began acting to implement your goals, you'd still hate him.
I think he's probably a "nice" guy, and don't dislike him personally. I disagree with many of his policies and don't think he has handled the war well but I think he's done better than the two non-options we had in 2000 and 2004.
2006-08-15 16:55:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Crusader1189 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush is responsible for all the destruction in the world. He destroyed too many families. At home and overseas. He will be miserable at some point in his life for what he's done.
And all you Bush fans... grow up a little. And yes, hating him is an understatement.
2006-08-15 17:26:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The lil' prince of America? Well, he's like a Spanisch prisoner, ain't he. But God is great and made him dumb enough not to see, so he remains as always: a happy man. He's just a piano player playing the songs the corporate world tells him to play... Or the monkey dancing to the organ of Cheney and his Carlucci-gang. Anyway, he seems not too unhappy. Hate him? Too much honour.
2006-08-15 17:36:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by jayoftee 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. Would have been much happier if he'd been honest, competent and not in the pocket of Mobil Exxon.
I imagine he's very sociable and quite likeable as a person. Pity about the policies.
2006-08-15 16:58:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by aelfgifu 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
If it wasn't for bush thousands of people would still be alive, oil prices would be lower & the world would be a safer place & environment less polluted - well done bush! - what a gay!
2006-08-15 16:59:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by WOOHA 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
No dummy, you're the pr**k, and obviously not a very useful one. Oh! if only we could send a tumbrel round for human ordure like you and lead you to Mr Guillotine!!
heavenlyhaggis
2006-08-15 17:03:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by d.perrot@btinternet.com 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Actually, I LUV loving him!
You're the prick!
2006-08-15 16:50:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by EDDie 5
·
2⤊
1⤋