English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

For the same reason people park on driveways and drive on parkways, why else?

2006-08-15 09:41:27 · answer #1 · answered by worldhq101 4 · 0 1

In the same sense that 'Mike can walk but walk cannot Mike' - Why do you play on words like this when you know it is a matter of language cognitive? Don't you see that you are giving a 'verb' the false identity of a noun and vise versa? Or are you playing on the double meaning of the word 'fly' which can be a noun too? But in this case you must have already known that 'fly' as a noun is distinguished from 'fly' as a verb in the context, and the statement you are presenting has the word fly as a verb, and to reverse it you have to find a noun other than the word 'bird' that can be a verb as well. Even then, your statement will not be 'true', because even if your new reversed statement might be grammatically correct, a fly can never be a bird, any way!

However, to give you the benefit of the doubt, I would go into a deeper level of abstract thinking, and say that it can be, if we empty the words from their cognitive meanings and give them new conceptual image of a symbol that means (something/some verb) and agree to it as a language to use among us. Then if I say "fly can bird' you will not look at it as a strange statement.

I wonder if this is what you had in mind when you asked that question!

2006-08-15 17:06:10 · answer #2 · answered by arabianbard 4 · 0 0

+2

2006-08-15 16:40:05 · answer #3 · answered by JJ 3 · 0 1

tell the fly to fly and found the verb(bird) because its not exist in English and if she found it she can bird

2006-08-15 18:27:47 · answer #4 · answered by khadijeh a 2 · 0 0

How do you know they can't?

Flies are known to recognize birds that eat flies and fly away, but ignore birds who do not eat flies.

For you reference:
2, bird: intransitive verb, to observe or identify wild birds in their natural environment[1]

2006-08-15 16:45:29 · answer #5 · answered by hq3 6 · 1 0

The English language should not be taken lightly. I think you knew the answer before you asked the question. Try learning about Plato's forms and then ask a serious question. You're wasting the most valuable resource on the Internet.

2006-08-15 18:39:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

good question, ummmmmmm.... by returning to a dictionary, bird means: an obscene gesture of contempt made by pointing the middle finger upward while keeping the other fingers down -- usually used with the; called also finger

I think that the fly can not bird beacause it does not have fingers!!

2006-08-15 16:59:11 · answer #7 · answered by Eyad 1 · 0 1

Because flies fly .. and birds never birdies ..
And Who told you fly cant bird ?? flies always bird .. in the air they bird and bird and even bird

2006-08-15 16:42:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

the fly can bird, it shot the bird the bird

2006-08-15 17:02:41 · answer #9 · answered by kornsap 2 · 0 1

Fly is a verb, bird is not.

2006-08-15 16:46:11 · answer #10 · answered by Lab Rat 3 · 0 1

fly is a noun and a verb, bird is only a noun

2006-08-15 22:10:49 · answer #11 · answered by starlightpenn 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers