To you Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve people, they had two sons so who were they getting with to make more kids!?!? Some sexuality is a choice and most is not. Being gay is not some kind of choice. It should be legal because if two "PEOPLE" really love each other why should they not be able to legally recognize that. If not then this country can not be called land of the free it would be land of the as long as your like everyone else your good to go.
2006-08-15 09:20:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by trl_666 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Let us assume for a moment that the Bible is the word of God and the truth.
Romans 1: says God turns them over to this condition for various reasons.
If that is the case then activity's after the fact should be up to God.
Next
The "We have been denied privileges strait people get"
If it was all about insurance and wills. They could incorporate and have more privilege than Heterosexual couples. Enjoying all the benefits of corporate life.
Finally
Recrasexual: If they are just having sex for the fun of it then marriage is not the best choice of institution for strictly fun. Maybe they could be Boy Scout leaders or Youth Pastors at a Church. That way they could experience the fun of the time honored tradition of Homosexuals molesting children.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-15 10:07:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by 43 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it were natural, the human race would have made it common long ago, when population control was even more important than it is now. Instead our ancestors chose infanticide, cannibalism, mass murder, and starvation. There must be some reason that they didn't adopt bisexuality instead.
A homosexual is a product of an unnatural marriage where the mother dominates the father. The son wants to either become like a woman or be dominated by women. The daughter has contempt for men or wants to dominate her men. The real cause of homosexuality is a lack of manliness in modern men. But even though homosexuality is the fault of the father, people born into this situation have to overcome this handicap. Re-inforcing it by marriage is like turning alcoholics into drug addicts.
2006-08-15 09:19:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, considering that homsexuality was never a sin until about the 13th century, that the church used to actually okay it, that some of the most ardent defenders of the faith were homosexuals, I have no qualms with it. Like Peter Griffin said on Family Guy, "Why not let them be miserable like the rest of us?"
And to the young lady above me, homosexuality is not a choice. A friend of mine tried the therapy, the indoctrination, the counseling, and all that to make himself straight. It doesn't work.
2006-08-15 09:12:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think that homosexuality is a CHOICE. guys choose to be gay and women choose to be lesbians. no, same sex marriage should not be legalized becasue it would degrade and slur the sactity of marriage between a man and woman. i not saying hate gays i'm saying that they made a poor choice and they need help in making it right and the best way to do that is to support them in their challenge to become straight. and about "following your heart" on sexual orientation, God made u inside and out and that means he knows ur heart better than anyone and he knows ur heart well enough that being homosexual will not make u truly happy and that u need to find the one person of the opposite sex that will make u truly happy. to the person below me, did he try praying with sincerety of heart? homosexuality just ins't meant to be b/c one of the reasons that we all came to earth is to be fruitful and multiply. how can a homosexual couple possibly meet that standard? and gays may not be hurting anything but they aren't helping now are they? and this counrty was also based on the principle "In God We Trust" i trust God enough to know that people are supposed to be straight and for anyone info adam and eve had more kids beside just two sons if u even bothered to read ALL of the first 5 books of the bible.
2006-08-15 09:12:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by smarttkdgirl 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The definition of a marriage is a union between a man and woman. Homosexuals can't be married since they don't meet the criteria. Just like girls can't join the Boy Scouts, and boys can't join the Girl Scouts.
You can call an apple an orange, but it is still an apple.
2006-08-15 09:20:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Every state and every church has to make that decision on a case by case basis.
Homosexuality is nothing to me one way or the other.
Dehumanizing sexuality from Homo or Hetro is an afront to me.
Arbitrary SEx acts to me, are like being animals.
Are we animals or humans?
Animals RAPE to get sex.
Should we let humans do that? Should we let ANY man DO ANY girl just to get it over and done with!?
Watch six males cats corner a female in heat and tell me that is no different from six drunk guys raping a girl in the alley.
2006-08-15 09:31:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Acting on homosexual impulses is wrong and is a choice.
Same sex "marriage" cannot exist because the definition of marriage is a man and a woman AND these actions are adulterous in that they are outside of the marriage covenant.
2006-08-15 09:11:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mister Bob the Tomato 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I have no issue with civil unions for gays. But marriage, as presently defined in our society, is betwen a man and a woman -- a male and a female. Thus gay marriage is an oxymoron.
2006-08-17 12:55:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by allmale 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say the more homo couples there are, the more women free for me to scam on. But Don't call it marriage...civil union or something is fine, but marriage was a Christian idea and it should, out of respect, remain theirs.
2006-08-15 09:18:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋