Shut up and be appreciative SOMEONE Is fighting for YOUR freedom!
Well, what if no one was fighting for your freedom.... we'd all be screwed. Does anyone appreciate human sacrifice anymore?
2006-08-15 08:45:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by gravytrain036 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
We are there because George Bush looked at the big map of the world and noticed how close Iraq and Afghanistan were and said, "Gee, I bet that Sadam is hiding some WMD's over there!" So we had to go over there and take on Iraq when we were already fighting a war in Afghanistan. Then in the end there were no WMD's. So we went over there for nothing! Interesting too how Bush goes on about helping free those poor people over there in Iraq. No one is rushing to Africa to stop the genocide they are committing against people every day. They don't have any oil, though.
2006-08-15 08:49:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Okkieneko 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Way bigger than 9/11 braniac. What about Afghanistan? We went there first didn't we? Are you seriously going to sit there and say we have absolutely no reasons to be over there? I think someone needs a history lesson. Or are you of the opinion that the way Carter, Regan Bush Sr. and Clinton (by doing nothing) handled the middle east allwoing the training of all these terrorists since the late seventies worked? I suppose you think we should just sit with them and discuss over tea?
2006-08-15 09:21:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by baby1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11, this is pretty incredible to see how peoples are quickly drafted to the leaders plans...
They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
Patriot Act : http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/default.html
The Bush's helped finance the Waffen SS and SA.
The Bush family has had dealings with Saddam Hussein involving oil drilling and real estate.
The Bush family has connections to the Bin Laden family. This includes a close partnership in the Carlyle group and Arbusto oil. The Bin Ladens and the Bush's have had a long close relationship.
However I don't know if they actually had money taken away being the Bush family has been known to bribe politicians.
t's funny how the Bush family has business dealings with people and governments who kill Americans. The people who are the biggest threat to our national security are friends and partners with the Bush's.
Makes you wonder who's side the Bush's are on.http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...
2006-08-15 08:49:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
this could be a undemanding false impression. If Al Qaeda worked like a helpful government or some thing, possibly this analogy would be proper, besides the undeniable fact that it is not. Al Qaeda operates on a "cellular" point, so operatives and small action communities basically decide for a message from somebody of their chain of command to activate, they are in many cases self-funded, by utilising distinctive characteristic of being the two funded by utilising some valid business enterprise activities the place salary are funneled in the direction of cellular activites OR by illict potential. the two way, it incredibly is how the Madrid and London operators have been functioning. the suitable thank you to envision it, is like Mc Donalds or 7-11 , the corporate headquarters would get nuked and the CEO could get killed, yet that doesn't relatively influence the franchise proprietor in Chicago, new york or la. it might temporarily disrupt or disable their communications , and the "suitable case" would be to possibly even decrease off a cellular from it relatively is command/administration, yet no longer something prevents a "status order" to activate or disband the cellular in this manner of case, besides. because it stands there have been some public terrorist incidents (Anthrax in FL,CT,new york,DC & NJ, the thwarted aerosolized cyanide/sarin in NYC, The London bombers carried out numerous helpful "dry runs" interior the hot york subways - unbeknownst to fatherland protection, and maximum those days the botched Ricin attack in Las Vegas.) and fatherland protection has in certainty caught up with numerous different communities or persons whom would or would possibly no longer have been making plans intense assaults upon US landmarks or inhabitants centers.
2016-11-04 21:08:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hindsight is 20/20
Everyone believed they were a threat to all or had the ability to be a direct threat within a few years.
Also the Iraqi people are a good people that needed saving from the tyrannical dictator Saddam Hussein.
The Iraqi people are one of the more educated of middle eastern countries and some of them are Catholic
some material on the origins of the peopleof Iraq
http://www.v-a.com/ashurai/liberating_iraq.html
http://www.v-a.com/ashurai/sept-11a.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Iraq
2006-08-15 09:17:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq is related to 9/11 in this way: Osoma used a couple thousand dollars, 19 wackos, and killed almost 3000 Americans and cost our economy 1 million jobs. Saddam had several billion dollars, an army of thousands, and WMD. He had a history of supporting terrorism ($25K to families of suicide bomers in Israel), invading his neighbors (Iran and Kuwait), and using WMD (Iran and the Kurds).
The lesson of 9/11 is that it does not take an army to hurt us. Saddam's army was no threat, but his resources were. He could give money to people like Osama. He could give WMD to people like Osama. Or he could just put 4 or 5 guys infected with a biological weapon on a plane to New York.
To spell it out for you: Osama had limited resources and managed to cause immense harm to us. Saddam had infinitely more resources than Osama. It would be suicide to allow evil bastards like Saddam to stay in power with all of the potential damage he could do.
And as a side benefit, we free 25 million people (you like being free don't you?) and help to establish Democracy in the middle east.
P.S. most terrorists come from poverty. If you help establish Democracy, the standard of living improves, you have less poverty, and therefore fewer terrorists in the future.
2006-08-15 09:07:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well iraq did infact support al queda as did afganistan, however unfortuantely that information has not made public. Which some will say why not? That is because it would inherently give away sources. Why question what we don't understand. I trust my country, work hard you can have a job. Let our elected officials deal with policy.
2006-08-15 08:53:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ken S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have some large oil customers but we needed a place to sell oil from. Certain countries need a lot of oil right now. So instead of just taking part of Iraq like we did after WWII and calling it Kuwait, we decided to take the whole thing this time.
2006-08-15 08:47:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Iraq is taking it on the chin for the accumulated sins of Islamo-Fascism in general. I doubt we are stopping there, as well.
This war is for more than GW's ego.
2006-08-15 08:47:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by © 2007. Sammy Z. 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
It was never said we were over there in response to 9/11. The President never said it, nor did anyone in congress, the UN, or any of the countries that are with us in Iraq.
2006-08-15 08:51:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋