Where is YOUR 9/11 conspiracy proof?

Question

Dear Conspiracy Theorists,
I want your proof. But it has to be yours - don't refer me to some website, move, or documentary - because that's the point of this question. Explain to me in your own words (and proper English is encouraged) what you see wrong in the official explaination of that terrible day. You need to write well enough to argue your point. As believer of the official explanation, I can't say I will agree with your answer, but the best worded and argued answer will get 10 points. The point of this question is to spark more conversation and deeper thinking about 5 years ago. Go on, maybe you'll somebody else a skeptic too!
Sincerely,
Curious About 9/11 Conspiracies

I acknowledge scoobyd3's point, and do realize that the same can asked of us as well. We each have our own perspective, we just need to be able to argue it. I was in college in PA at the time and remember that mass exodus of students, armed cops on campus, and the the planeless night, so the media perspective aside, I saw its effects.

Answer 1

OK, I'll bite. But just for fun. Give the 10 points to someone else.

Now, imagine that you are a secret service agent. You're a senior officer with a career and a pension to protect, and a family who is dependent upon you. And most importantly, you are in charge of a team of agents who's primary task is to protect the President of the United States - at ALL costs.

Now place yourself in a Presidential motorcade on it's way to a PUBLICIZED visit to a classroom in Florida. You are informed that a hijacked airliner just crashed into the World Trade Center and that FAA is aware of at least one other known hijacking.

What's your call? You have 100's of airliners flying within minutes of your location traveling to airports in Naples, Tampa, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, Palm Beach, and other points nearby.

Are any of these airliners about to be hijacked and crashed into the school where you're headed? Is there any way for you to determine that? From a risk based perspective, should you abort the PR broadcast and get the president out of the area?

With this new information you arrive at the school. Your team escorts the President and his entourage into the building and into the classroom. The President has already been briefed on the first plane crash.

Shortly after the president is seated in the classroom and is live on television - with his location known to the entire world - you recieve a message that the second hijacked airliner has struck the second tower at the World Trade Center. You are also told that the FAA is aware of at least one more hijacking and there may be others.

At this point, again, what do you do? Do your eyes look skyward, knowing that this PR visit was announced in advance and that any of the airliners within 100 miles could be hitting you in ten minutes or less? In one minute? What do you do? The President isn't responding - should you be looking out for him and taking no chances?

But on 9/11, the Secret Service DID NOT move the President to safety. There were planes in the air heading to various nearby destinations while other planes on the east coast were being hijacked and slammed into high profile targets. The Presidents schedule had been published well in advance and his location was being broadcast on live television.

Why was Bush not protected? There are only two options, in my opinion. The Secret Service failed miserably and placed our Executive leadership in grave danger by failing to react appropriately. Or they knew that there was no threat to the President and that none of the planes in the region would be hijacked and targetting the school.

Considering that nobody was punished, which scenario is more likely?

Answer 2

Well, if every American has a rocket launder like the members of Hizbollah have, then the second tower would still be there, because some Brave American would have used his personal Stinger Missle to down the plane before it hit!

Maybe ALL Americans should own Stinger Missles!

A well regulated Militia, necessary for the defense of the country.

That is enough in the Constitution to warrant EVERY American owning a Bazoooka or Stinger Missle!

I definately think ANYONE working in a NY High Rise should own a Stinger and a Parachuet

Who give a hoot about consipracy. You see a 747 coming at your builing, pull out your Stinger Missle and shoot!

Survive at the expense of others.

That's the American way!

I think ALL high rise buildings in LA, NY, SF and Miami should have a Stinger Missile right next to the Fire Hose.

In an Emergency, break glass, pull tube, open tube, aim at Jet Plane, pull trigger, duck and cover.

This would DEFINATELY END Jet Plane Terrorism!

I say EVERY AMERICAN should remember the flight that crashed.

The RAG HEADS take over, RUSH THEM. KILL THEM, DOWN THE PLANE but NOT at the TARGET THEY INTEND.

Make them BLOW IT.

Every PASSENGER on EVERY plane should remember those brave people and if some RAG HEAD starts something, OPEN THE DOOR AND SHOW THEM THE WAY OUT!

How's that for a Conspiracy theory

I think EVERY Westerner should join the CONSPIRACY to END THE LIFE OF RADICAL RAG HEADS ON THE SPOT.

Daryll Gates was right! For Hijackers we need a bus with 12 people a judge and a rope. Drive it to the plane, give them a fair trial and then do what comes next!

NO APPEALS FOR THE RAG HEADS. All decisions FINAL.

EVERYONE go out and buy a stinger missile and wait for the day to use it and don't be afriad to use it. Down ANY PLANE where you never saw it before.

If Hizbollah can own missles then SO CAN YOU. Otherwise the WORLD better take HIZBOLLAH TO TASK OR SHUT UP.

If Hizbollah can own missles and rockets then EVERYONE CAN AND SHOULD and should USE THEM when ATTACKED.

If Hizbollah is correct and the JEws aren't, then EVEYRONE BUY A MISSLE

Yo can get them anywhere! The Russians will sell them to you. Buy one, Keep it, USE IT WHEN ATTACKED.

Hizbollah is CORRECT so YOU ARE CORRECT!

Answer 3

too much to really go into everything. lets look at the WTC 7 building. Not even the twin towers. Why did it fall? Why was it demolished?

About six months prior to the attacks, silverstein, the owner, took out a multibillion dollar insurance policy that directly covered acts of terrorism. But that is one man and ONE aspect of WTC 7. You can look it up further your own.

Now, the towers. The towers fell straight down at almost free fall speed. free fall can only occur if there was NO RESISTANCE (meaning no floors below). CLearly there were floors, and in any footage you can see explosions occuring several floors below the collapse. Steel melts at 2700 degreesF. Jet fuel burns at about 1600 degreesF. If the infrastructure was damaged THAT badly, the building would have fallen sooner, but even the architects of the WTC say that it was built with plane attacks in mind.

Recently, a BYU university professor found traces of Thermate, a thermite based substance, in the samples from ground zero. Thermate cuts through metal like a hot knife through butter. Then there are the videos...why did the FBI confiscate all videos from security cams around the pentagon. Now, the ONLY video released, isnt even real time and doesn't show anything. Yousee nothing, then in the right corner you see an object, then a hole in the pentagon.

This was just a few. I used to thinnk the way you do, then I started studying. I also read up on the magazines and sites debunking this and still do as the info comes out. I want to be wrong. I will give you a few sources below but, you are right, noone should listen to a particular site or documentary and assume they are correct. Investigate where you can.

I just want a full independent investigation into 9/11. The 9/11 panel already released they believe the pentagon reps lied to them since their testimony conflicts with the newly released tapes. This is the BIPARTISAN group saying they were trying to decide whether to take legal action or not!!

_______________________________

SPLATT is partially right. This would be a bipartisan effort. If one party really watched over another this would not happen. They all have the same connections.

Answer 4

U can't prove a conspiracy, unless u know who the conspirators are. In this case, it is not needed. What u can do is apply a scientific method of examination. Simply put, using our ability to compare evidence, the official story with what we know to be physically possible, scientifically. The WTC 1&2 was built to withstand 13,000. tons of pressure. Each plane at most weighed about 300 tons. Include the speed of each, at the point of impact, and u still wouldn't come close to causing all that damage. The evidence from other accidents, similar to 911, supports this claim. With that said, if planes hitting bldgs could cause that type of destruction, everyone in Manhattan, living or working in a high rise, or skycrapper, is in danger. Also, there is an issue of collateral damage. Do u ever wonder why more plane crashes happen in remote , or less populated areas? Flight Plans. NYC (Manhattan) is a non-commercial flight zone. If NORAD had been doing it's job, those planes should have been shot down. Who gave the order for the military to stand down? If u have commercial planes flying over populated areas, u increase the possibility of more damage if the plane malfunctions. It's a very difficult position to be in when u have to compare lives based on numbers. Do the research, don't just believe for the sake of believing. When we don't scrutinize what our leaders are doing, we pay for it in the long run, either with our lives (military-Iraq) or our pockets (taxes-haliburton).

Answer 5

ok, i wont direct u to a website but google "pnac" and "rebuilding americas defenses .... find out what the pnac is all about ... who are members ... what their stated goals are ..... then look at the current administration and what is happening in the middle east .... its pretty obvious that the plans of the pnac are being carried out olmost precisely as written in "rebuilding americas defenses" and when you see clearly that this is the case all u have to do is put 2 and 2 together to see that "the war on terror" is a propaganda war and 911 was a govt sponsored "false flag" operation .... not a new concept and in fact its been used many times throughout our history by the cia and the administrations to provide a pretext to achieve an agenda ... the vietnam war is a good example of a govt "false flag" operation ... its been declassified now and the gulf of tonkin incident that the president used to start the vietnam war was a settup ... and it sent 68000 american troops to their deaths for a lie ... 911 is the same thing and if u google the terms above u will find out that iraq is not about oil or terrorism or liberating iraqis or weapons of mass destruction or any of that bs ... its about the current administration thinking they are being patriotic by setting up military bases in the middle east to head off a growing threat by China ... google also "china nuclear threat". The administration knows that without 911 the US population and the world would have never supported another military buildup or a takeover of iraq to build a permanent military base ... so oh yeah ... dont hold ur breath on US troops ever coming home from over there in iraq ... we will be there for a very long time.

Answer 6

Our PROOF was shipped away to asia to be melted down...Steven E. Jones (A highly credited physics professor and BYU) gained a piece of the wreckage at the WTC site, analyzed it, and concluded that there was a certain compound on the metal that is a signature of the substance "thermate" which is a specially engineered version of "thermite". Thermate is commonly used in controlled demolition.

Also take into consideration the fact that a steel reinforced structure has never fallen due to a fire. Most of the jet fuel burned off in the fireball and then the fire within the buildings maintained a normal temperature fire.

Go to google video and look up the word "thermite" there you will most likely find a small clip with an experiment of the substance...also you may come across a clip of video evidence of the thermate pouring out of the side of the south tower of the WTC...go look.

Answer 7

That largely depends on what kind of Proof you will be most likely to understand. There is a mountain of circumstantial evidence pointing to our government while Osama as listed on the FBI website is not even wanted for 9/11 because as FBI director Robert Mueller put it "We have no evidence to link him to the attack on 9/11".

What really got me was WTC 7 (the 3rd building that collapsed later that day) and the evidence for controlled demolition. Watch the towers going down and you can see the explosions shooting out from underneath where the building is collapsing. Also pyroclastic flow (the term used to describe solid matter being vaporized and thus acting like a liquid) which only happens during explosions and volcanic eruptions was exactly what happened to the concrete and building materials when it collapsed.

And I'm giving you a link anyway.

Answer 8

The conspiracy theories will remain until certain basic questions are answered. There are things that really need to be explained and have just been glossed over. The conspiracy comes from the lack of answers, not just the threading together of a billion diverse events into one super sophisticated, brilliantly planned, covert government take-over. What paranoia does is keep us asking the questions, and I have 2 that have not been satisfactorily dealt with: a) the exact duplication of the imploding towers from 2 different planes hitting 2 different places at 2 different angles, and b) Tower 7, which was not hit at all. These are readily observable events and require no proof - just answers.

Answer 9

Thats all anyone wants is proof, the sad truth of the matter is, there is none. For instance, say it went down the way we have all heard. Great, we all know something about it was omitted by the government, its no big secret that they keep us in the dark on certain things. Ok, so maybe it didnt go the way we have all heard it stated, there again, we are left in the dark on those points as well. Believe either side, they both lack evidence. There are small points that show each has validity, and there is lack of proof that questions both. Your asking for something that can't be given until someone in our government stands up and shows us what in my opinion we have every right to know, hear, and see.

Answer 10

That can be answered as easily as this. Where is your proof of the events that happened. Not what the 9/11 commission put out, now what your heard on the new, or from a website but your own proof. BTW, before people bite my head off, I do not believe in 911 conspiracys. I am just pointing out this persons terrible logic.