He's killed as more people with his ideas of war and shaping a nation than the 9/11 attacks. Sure we responded. But aren't we getting enough revenge? We easily replaced Saddam Hussein. Not as bad, but aren't more Bushes seek presidency. Not too much of a future to hope for.
2006-08-15 08:30:53 · 17 answers · asked by artmastercf 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
i totally agree with u..
it is just that bush cant get enough killing..
it seems like its a hobby.. or sometimes i feel its his job..
or maybe an illlness he cant get rid of..
he is killing ppl in lebanon, palestine, israel, iraq, afghanistan..
he is killing americans too when he sends them to war..
who is the terrorist..
yes BUSH is..
thanks for ur question pall..
i give u 5/5
2006-08-15 08:37:53 · answer #1 · answered by N a e 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
wow, it must be hard to make it through the day with the amount of hatred you have for Bush. Have you forgotten that even people who think like you were killed 9/11. It's not like the terrorist chose a Red state to attack or just Republicans.
Yes Saddam is gone, check. Now when the people of Iraq can sustain their own country we leave.
2006-08-15 15:38:55 · answer #2 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I believe Bush is more than just a terrorist with his following of the Neocons, and his Fascist style rule he has America under. Bush has the American Congress and Military at his disposal. I believe he has over stepped his power of America as a Nation supposedly to be a Democracy. Bush isn't following the Constitution and Bill of Rights and should be impeached, and than brought up on charges, that's what I believe.
2006-08-15 15:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
No, he is not a terrorist, and that is a pretty unamerican thing to say. If he was marching people into ovens, or suicide bombing other countries, then you would be right, but you ar grossly wrong. If you think bush is a terrorist, then you don't know terrorists, and how bad they can really be. He has done more good in a year than terrorists do in their lifetime.
2006-08-15 15:37:58 · answer #4 · answered by greencaddyman 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Terrorism is defined as any act of violence or the threat of violence for political purposes no matter the cause. This means that any war in the history of the Planet has been an act of terrorism. Which also means that most countries on the planet today are terrorist. Please at least know the meaning of the words you use, thanks.
2006-08-15 15:39:21 · answer #5 · answered by shaun1986 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree!!! It is a fact that Bush has schemed terroristic acts on a much larger scale than any of the other terrorist. And our own men and women are paying the price for his sick games.
2006-08-15 15:37:21 · answer #6 · answered by Wildflower 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No matter what you think of Bush, he never purposely tried to kill innocent people, whereas terrorists purposely target innocent people. Bush may be a pretty poor President who has made many costly mistakes, but he's not a terrorist. Grow up.
2006-08-15 15:37:20 · answer #7 · answered by monger187 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Thats funny, civilized society agree's with Bush. Maybe not 100% of the execution, but with the world becoming global economy the middle east had to be dealt with some how. Those countries who disagree with our middle east policy unfortuanelty have economic reasons not policy reasons.
2006-08-15 15:39:08 · answer #8 · answered by Ken S 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush isn't a terrorist, but he sure made some bad decisions.
2006-08-15 15:37:29 · answer #9 · answered by Maria Gallercia 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are using yahoo!answers inappropriately. This is from the rules page:
YOU MAY NOT POST CONTENT ...
to vent your frustrations, rant, make statements, or otherwise violate the question and answer format.
I got 2 points
2006-08-15 15:41:36 · answer #10 · answered by redsoxnoxrox 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋