2006-08-15 06:38:17 · 23 answers · asked by Heroic Liberal 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
but not the heroic ones
2006-08-15 06:38:55 · update #1
Err...I thought that by definition a Lib would have to be somewhat mentally challenged.
2006-08-15 06:43:52 · answer #1 · answered by battalion_of_fear 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
troll
v.,n. 1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To
utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable
responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase
"trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream
"trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a
likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post
that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look
even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to
the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate
troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See
also YHBT. 2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1;
regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a
newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to
annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by
the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic
at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly
creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming
characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of
life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." 3.
[Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS
students. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that lab
policies are followed. Probably so-called because it involves
lurking in dark cavelike corners.
Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower
category than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing
some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See
also Troll-O-Meter.
2006-08-15 06:44:14 · answer #2 · answered by carl l 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Did you know 1 in every 2 conservatives are now or have at some point in their lives knowingly lied about politics?
You're retarded right now!
2006-08-15 06:46:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Did you know that 1 in every 2 posters on this board make up statistics to support their argument with no valid evidence whatsoever.
2006-08-15 06:54:51 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Even for you this is a new low. What is next? Are you going to make fun of the physically handicapped or cancer patients? If your heart was on fire I wouldn't p*ss down your throat to put it out. You are nothing but a coward.
2006-08-15 07:13:40 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Rule one of getting your point across: NEVER resort to namecalling!
It doesn't matter what you are trying to say or prove or convince anyone of. If the best you can do is resort to namecalling, you will look like you can't prove your point based on the validity of the point itself and your only option left is to personally attack.
2006-08-15 06:45:24 · answer #6 · answered by i1patrick 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Did you know that 4 out of five voters can't even identify the platform that their preferred candidate is running on?
2006-08-15 07:01:32 · answer #7 · answered by whydothedumboutnumberthesmart? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All liberals are mentally retarded.... including the heroic ones!
2006-08-15 06:43:39 · answer #8 · answered by Smitty 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Enough with the 2nd grade schoolyard insults. There are plenty of reasons to disagree with liberals, but this name-calling crap is just stupid and childish.
2006-08-15 06:56:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Tossing crap from the playpen again? Isn't it almost nap time? How was snack today? Ants on a log kick a*s!!.
2006-08-15 06:57:20 · answer #10 · answered by Franklin 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well it's better than conservatives who are mentally retarded all the time
2006-08-15 06:45:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋