Still can't come up with anything better than smearing and name-calling? Pitiful.
2006-08-15 06:00:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Will 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
There is actually an answer stating they hate the constitution. Wow. Liberals are the ones tearing the constitution to shreds. Most liberal judges ought to be arrested and put in jail for raping the constitution as they have for the last 40 years.
A wise man once said, "it is better to remain silent and have others think you a fool, than to open your mouth and prove it".
More people ought to take that advice.
2006-08-15 06:11:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by matt b 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
a million. Make strippers such as you 2. Bribe the bouncer to no longer destroy your good arm once you circulate the line with a stripper 3. Do coke lower back given which you acquire thrown out of the strip club.
2016-12-11 09:10:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
From time to time, a liberal will ask here plaintively why the conservatives say such nasty things about liberals. This sort of nasty gram is exactly why we do that, and I can tell you it's great fun to slam the nasty back, even if both sides are somewhat juvenile. (Guilty as charged, your honor.)
My favorite one -- which I wrote myself -- answering a question was counting brain cells in liberals:
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, um, I guess they have 0.
If the Dems take over the legislature next year, expect a city to get nuked by the terrorists.
2006-08-15 06:03:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by retiredslashescaped1 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I still support him because I graduated into a great economy and a great job market. I got a great job right out of school and believe that Bush's tax cuts enabled small businesses save money and invest in more entry level employees.
Oh yeah, and 5 years after 9/11, we haven't had another terrorist attack here. I think that is pretty impressive the Bush admin deserves most of the credit for that.
2006-08-15 06:00:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by HokiePaul 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
They do not have minds of their own. There is nothing Bush could do to change their minds. That's the difference. Many Democrats disliked Clinton. These hard-core nuts are brainwashed.
2006-08-15 09:27:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither! saying someone is retarded is very rude and accusing someone of doing drugs without proof is wrong.Bush backers still believe he was the right one for the job. I'm much happier having Bush in office than I would have been had Kerry won.
2006-08-15 06:02:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Slam64 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
First, if you are going to round off....do it right....it would be 40%, and that is because of some of his policies seem to be a little astray....but the 40% that do support him, know that it matters not.....you must support your president, no matter who he is......and no matter what he does.......you get rid of him at the next election, if you don't like him.....oh yeah, that past, and we did......oh well, wait until his term is up then
2006-08-15 06:53:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you go behind the numbers of the approval polls you'll realize that the 70% who disapprove don't support the other side. In fact their are just as many who disapprove because he's not been conservative enough--too much spending, too much military restraint, no vetoes, etc.
The country is more conservative than ever, and the numbers support that fact.
2006-08-15 06:01:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by dizneeland 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Maybe they like the Iraq War. Maybe they like owing Communist China a Trillion Dollars. Maybe they hate the Constitution and support warrantless searches and torture and holding people without trial or without bail. Maybe they are making some of the $9 billion that just disappeared from Iraq. Maybe they can't read. Maybe they don't watch the news. Maybe they are Republican robots who accept everything their party does because they zeig heil and hate everything those awful liberals do. There are a lot of reasons why people could still support Bush. Good reasons? Well not exactly..........
2006-08-15 05:59:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by jxt299 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Can't really speak for all of them, but I suppose one reason is because they still believe it is worth the effort to destroy islamo-facism instead of giving up. And he is one of the few world leaders that is still willing to keep trying. Instead of trying to appease a group who's main reason for existence is to destroy all they perceive as a threat to their brand of religious fanaticism.
2006-08-15 06:02:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋