2006-08-15 05:29:47 · 5 answers · asked by Carito 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He is a very poor loser.
I had an open mind about him, because I would really like to see someone in Mexico get true universal education etc. going there (so they quit illegally coming here). However, this idea that disrupting the entire country is ok if it might possibly give him an advantage, when there is no sign of corrupt practices on the vote, doesn't inspire respect.
2006-08-15 05:52:43 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He has a valid point. Exit polls, if they were done accurately, pointed to him having a 500,000 vote lead. The official tally had him losing by 0.58% of the vote. That is a large order to be attributed to random chance -- either there were irregularities, or the exit polls were wrong. Either way, he's the better candidate.
2006-08-15 12:38:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that he would take Mexico back to what it was twenty years ago and he's one hell of a great-bad loser.
2006-08-15 12:36:24 · answer #3 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he's making a big problem in mexico. he should just stop and try again in the next election as all he's doing is hurting his country.
2006-08-15 12:36:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is only the great loser!and dont want put their hands off!manuel .....stop fighting!
2006-08-15 12:37:45 · answer #5 · answered by White Man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋