Is being a liberal is a bad thing?

Question

Maybe I shouldn't be so liberal, God forbid I make an opinion based on facts and events rather than self righteous blind patriotism.

Answer 1

the words liberal and conservative have been twisted by the Republican party. Are they conservative when they plung the country into neeless debt and enter needless wars?

Liberal bad? it mean that you stand for individual rights, progressive forms of taxation withouit favoring the wealthy, etc.

,,and how is it patriotic to blindly follow a mad man?

Answer 2

Classical Jeffersonian liberal? No, that's a good thing. Individual responsibility, self-reliance, freedom, liberty and a very limited government that is limited to specified powers.

Current liberalism? That's a whole 'nother thing. Progressive class-warfare based taxation, socialist welfare statism, imposed limits on Bill of Right rights, unconstitutional usurpation and concentration of power by the federal government, unconstitutional judicial tyranny, government intrusion into every aspect of our lives, etc. No, I think that IS bad - so would every single man that founded this nation and fought for her independence.

Now, I think you liberals paved this road to hell with your good intentions, but that doesn't change the fact that it is what you created.

Finally, you choose to insult us who disagree with you, in a manner which many might find 'self-righteous', 'blind' and partisan. You seem to think (or would 'feel' be the more accurate verb?) that we do not base our opinions on facts and events. The fact is that we trust facts, events and evidence to lead us to the answer - we do not trust our 'feelings' to do this.

Here's an idea - why not start with first not insulting your opponents? Or is that too much to ask of the 'tolerant' people?

Answer 3

NO it's not a bad think at all. Don't switch your stance just because it's the unpopular one currently; it beats the hell out of being ignorant and ill informed. Don't listen to bildymooner, you CAN be a liberal even if you just envoked god in your statement. He's being ignorant, especially since he claims that liberals know that there is no place for god in their lives. CindyL, liberalism IS NOT a mental disorder at all and you know that.

Liberals are acutally smarter than conservatives, especially when conservatives claim to be smarter than liberals. If they were smarter than liberals like wally claims them to be, then we wouldn't have wasted taxpayers money on the "war on terror" which has been nothing but a scam from the get go since the war on terror is actually over the oil the middle east produces.

If we punished the successful like wally also claims that we do, every successful person from Hollywood to every major corporation would be punished. The only time we punish someone successful is when they commit a white collar crime and think they can get away with it.

Answer 4

I am sorry, but how does making a decicion based on fact have anything to do with being a liberal? Oh, I remember. Anything you make up on the spot is considered a fact!.

By the way, patriotism is not blind. If it was, all liberals would be the best patriots.

Answer 5

Patriotism, so they say, is the last refuge of a scoundrel. and to correct CindyL, the expression is if you are not a socialist by the time your 16 you have not heart but if you are still a socialist at 20 you have no brain. The point being is that if you have a heart you can empathise with he social justice of socialism but by the time your are just a little older you should be critical of it. Not that you should then make a retrogressive step to conservatism. Liberalism has its problems but at least it is a thinking stance that may make progress not just a knee jerk reaction.

Answer 6

Being liberal is a bad thing. At least call it what it really is, social-communism.

Facts? From a liberal? Honey, the two don't go in a sentence together. It's okay to love your contry and not care what that freak in North Korea thinks of you. Be proud of living in the greatest country on the Earth. Our soldiers are heroes, and they are out there fighting terrorists on the terrorists' home turf, not your back yard. This is a GOOD thing!

Don't be ashamed to be white, either. You haven't done anything wrong, and having light european skin tones is not bad!

Say, maybe you earn your own money and know how to spend it better than the government. Maybe you succeed on your own without government help.

You know, the first settlers here in America were SELF-SUFFICIENT, didn't need communists taking half their income to give to the lazy person next door!

Good luck, and really, stop idolizing people like Bill "rapist" Clinton and "Leave her to drown" Kennedy...they are bad people.

Answer 7

I find that labeling oneself as "liberal" or "conservative" only tends to seperate people from one another and, in the end diminish everyone's political power.

I believe that you should find your own answers to political questions. Don't universally subscribe to one ideology or another based on a few common points. It is possible to be both pro-environment (liberal) and pro-life (conservative). You can be for tax cuts (conservative) and for social welfare programs (liberal).

Find your own beliefs, then figure out which ones are the most important, then vote for the CANDIDATE that agrees with you on what are YOUR most important beliefs.

...by the way, C.S. Lewis once refered to patriotism as a substitute for religion.... just thought you might find that an interesting point when talking to uber patriots.

Answer 8

make your opinions the way you see fit. Most people will just follow the crowd and not actually get the whole story first. if that means you vote for this Democrat that liberal and this republican in the same election then you voted by facts. Some think they MUST vote straight ticket even if it goes against some things they believe in. Does what i say make any sence

Answer 9

wealthy isn't undesirable of itself. it is the options-set about that richness and the translation that being wealthy is by some skill an indication of superiority it really is the problem. the wealthy being disparaged fail to do not ignore that they are in uncomplicated words really diverse from something else human beings in having funds. They (those that imagine this way) act as inspite of the undeniable fact that that straightforward assertion isn't actual, that by some skill being wealthy can provide privilege no longer accessible to the non-wealthy, and places the wealthy right into a separate class of citizen. A secondary component it really is a source of well-known disapproval is the theory that the wealthy are wealthy merely and fully because of their personal movements, even as it truly is obtrusive to maximum folk who no one is punctiliously to blame for his or her difficulty, and that any one which does prevail in a society does so in part because society creates the circumstances permitting for that fulfillment. As such, the wealthy might want to make a contribution back to society in a fashion that recognizes the function of society in permitting every person to prevail. Many wealthy refuse to settle for that responsibility, they in uncomplicated words desire the income. And in case you forged that particular same idea procedure on different communities, that the human beings in uncomplicated words understand their rights even as denying the concomitant popular jobs, i doesn't call that unacceptable bias.

Answer 10

My mother told me the following when I was 16 or 17: You can be liberal all you want in your own home, in your own bedroom, but when your on the street, work, or support the government think conservative because the world will never be ready for "Free Love".