English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have Aaron Brooks and Eric Moulds.. the other team wants to give me Kurt Warner and Kennison for them.

should i take it?

2006-08-15 04:06:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Fantasy Sports

12 answers

yes. warner is a good backup with more potential that broks to start and kennison is no. 1 in kc, other than tony, but tony might also have to pick up the slack with the loss of willie roaf, which will make kennison a more valuable fantasy wr. also, moulds is the 2nd option to the speedy andre johnson and carr has yet to prove he can take blitz'. so definetly take it.

2006-08-15 07:45:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Brooks blows, porter doesnt even want to stay in oak. So that leaves a double coveraged moss. brooks always screws me in fantasy. Moulds has a shaky qb and O-line. he wont really get the ball too often bc his qb wil be on the ground.

Warner has a nice set or WR's and a quality RB now. Kennison is always productive. Why worry about KC's O-line? I'd be terrified of Houstons.

Take the trade, you'll make out

2006-08-15 14:35:49 · answer #2 · answered by c-money 4 · 0 0

Nope. ..not because they are THAT much better..but if you've seen both games Brooks ahs been in the pre-season, you'll know. Plus Kennison sucks...

2006-08-15 11:30:47 · answer #3 · answered by nowolfgang 2 · 0 0

I've had Aaron Brooks the last two years ... Unfortunately ... He is a horrible prospect .... Stay away! If you have him find a sucker to trade him to ... PLUS the Saints O-Line is better than the one he will play behind this season in Oakland so it can only get worse

2006-08-15 11:53:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mooner8300 1 · 0 0

keep brooks and Moulds

Brooks gets a new start in oakland and works with jordan, moss, and porter

moulds gets a new start in houston with carr, johnson and davis

sometimes the best trades are the ones not made.

wait and see what happens

warner will eventually get hurt..and KC may not be as good as everyone thinks..and their o-line is taking hits already

2006-08-15 11:20:11 · answer #5 · answered by dave z 2 · 0 0

I would keep Warner for now. He has a great receiving corps. I have never had any luck with Brooks.

2006-08-15 11:12:17 · answer #6 · answered by John W 2 · 0 0

Aaron brooks stinks-get rid of him-kurt will have a good year-he is healthy and has good recievers

2006-08-15 11:12:48 · answer #7 · answered by baba booey 2 · 0 0

yes get rid of brooks and you dont know about moulds taking a look at houston last year.

2006-08-15 13:55:55 · answer #8 · answered by vucker4 2 · 0 0

Warner is way to fragile to trade for.

2006-08-16 13:59:24 · answer #9 · answered by FatElvis 4 · 0 0

no

2006-08-15 11:47:08 · answer #10 · answered by AJ 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers