2006-08-15 03:56:57 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
yeah i agree
2006-08-15 04:00:11 · answer #1 · answered by prizzma 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think you're one of those ignorant pricks and may it should have been you in the Twin Towers on 9/11 and not the innocent people who died. You obviously do not understand what the war against Terrorism really is. It's not a war for oil it's a war where people just like you are risking there lives everyday to ensure your freedom. I'm one of those people in the Air Force that are making sure you can sleep at night without having to worry and it's the people like you that make comments like this that make me wish we still drafted people and put you right in the middle of it and maybe then you would understand why we need to be over there fighting this war.
2006-08-15 04:12:12 · answer #2 · answered by gweb926 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone helped elect ALL of those troop manipulating representatives that unitedly VOTED to ENABLE the war in Iraq. The DECADES of supposed knowledge and experience from career politicians really stinks.
Since it appears support for political back pedaling troop USERS with shallow appeasement works so well among those 'supposedly' demanding accountability ~ the cost would be the responsibility of the shallow people who are APPEASED by political career scripted drones!
Troop support demands more than some people are able to wholeheartedly understand eh! Pay up, AND vote OUT manipulating troop users who hide behind shallow words, and works to build their own political careers while our troops put their lives on the line.
2006-08-15 04:20:33 · answer #3 · answered by friojc 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No man, all that support the IRAQ war should be sent over there to have a look at the victims, not only the American soldiers but the Iraqi casualties as well. Then hand them a shovel instead of a gun.
2006-08-15 04:02:39 · answer #4 · answered by Avatar13 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
An interesting idea...I think we've got a steady supply of kids hooked on war videogames willing to take thier "game" to the next level. But most people that vote and could be held accountable for voting red in 04 are senior citizens. They can't fight so good anymore... unless you have the gamers control these elderly draftees via some sort of mind control/ bioarmor apparatus...
2006-08-15 04:19:09 · answer #5 · answered by rumblebeez 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, but, in a ideal world there wouldn't be war. if those who wanted war would pay for it and fight in it, that would somewhat ideal. but its not an ideal world so we deal with what were handed. our government is set up so our leaders do what they think is right once theyve been elected by the voters. it dosent work they way some would like it unless it goes in thier favor, of course. so i say vote for who wont get into war as long you can live with the other choices the people you vote for make. higher taxes, your hard earned money going to a majority of lazy people who wont work and have more babies to take more of your money.
2006-08-15 04:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by walstib_710 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just like all those who support welfare should be made to pay it, let's not stop there abortion, food stamps, the UN, Aids grants. I agree with you, college scholarships based on skin color, college funding for colleges that discriminate... I'll sign up as soon as you pay for the things you support. don'tcha think?
2006-08-15 04:06:23 · answer #7 · answered by Rich E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether or not we believe in this war is not the question. The negativity from those opposed does not help our soldiers who are over there. Lets support them and just agree to disagree with the war but not make their purpose feel pointless.
2006-08-15 04:03:10 · answer #8 · answered by angelkiss 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think all those that think that terrorism does not exist and nothing should be done about it should move to the middle east and see how long they last. In fact where a big sign that says I'm a Democrat Liberal and I support you. You will still be killed because you are not arab and a Muslim.
2006-08-15 04:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some of us did serve our country. We dont expect libs to do that kind of work, we'd like it done properly. You are so out of touch. I hope that when you get out of diapers that you grow half of a brain and realize what this country is. How many real men had to shed their blood to give some pathetic flag burning trol the right to spit on our flag. We would have fragged ya..... No doubt about that.
2006-08-15 04:10:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that true of this war but no others?
Would you have had FDR and Harry Truman enlist instead of lead
during World War II?
Yes, I think it is disgusting that so many politicians protect their own
children from having to serve while advocating the war, but that mean
they are right or wrong.
2006-08-15 04:01:48 · answer #11 · answered by Elana 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋