2006-08-15 03:33:41 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Is that actually a debated thing?
2006-08-15 03:39:18 · answer #1 · answered by sam21462 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. This is a myth. India's partition was done because of angry patriots... If there was no hate, then it wouldn't have even been considered a "partition"
2006-08-15 03:39:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gandhi was utterly opposed to partition.
2006-08-15 07:43:39 · answer #3 · answered by Spel Chekker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nOT AT ALL.
INDIA was prtitioned because of the internal clash between Nehru and Jinnah. Have a VERY detailed study of the whole history of India.
2006-08-15 03:43:48 · answer #4 · answered by Pink Rose 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, but mohammmed ali jinnah was!!read the book"freedom at midnight" by dominic lapierre- it tells u the entire event of partition-its cause,result etc....
2006-08-15 03:39:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i believe it was more the work of the moslems in the north, that wanted a seperate country(pakistan).
2006-08-15 17:47:19 · answer #6 · answered by Stuie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋