2006-08-15 03:16:50 · 21 answers · asked by Chesh » 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
yea probably, because then people would have some discipline, which is often the problem - people need to be taught right and wrong and school is as good a place as any
2006-08-15 03:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No been tried. The only reason in the fifties there were less yobs on the street, was because of the second World War. Bullying never works, time to try a new formula
2006-08-15 03:23:21 · answer #2 · answered by thecharleslloyd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As above, schools AND parents are to blame. My generation didn't have the problems we do now. If I was out of line, boy did I know it. People also need to be taught to have a conscience. Without it, people become yobs.
2006-08-15 03:35:44 · answer #3 · answered by ragill_s1849 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is a combination of schools and parents. After all whats the point of school being strict if kids can do what they like outside of it. The main problem seems to be not how strict the schools are but the lack of support they get from (some) parents when they try to tell them that there is a problem with their child.
2006-08-15 03:23:00 · answer #4 · answered by geegee 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Think the root of the problem is nearer to home!!! Think if parents cared for their kids...and were a bit stricter..then yeah...I think that there would be less yobs on the street.
2006-08-15 03:32:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yobs are a product of a childs upbringing - they tend to follow the example of influential adults
No ammount of strict discipline in schools can correct yobbish behaviour if they continue to be exposed to bad example outside school
2006-08-15 03:28:01 · answer #6 · answered by vincegill 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If schools were more strict it is possible people might know the difference between 'less' (correctly used to refer to differing amounts of an overall quantity e.g. 'less sugar in my tea') and 'fewer' (correctly used in the context of the number of individual items e..g. 'fewer yobs on the street.').....
2006-08-15 03:28:34 · answer #7 · answered by eriverpipe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, there'd be more because the yobs would either play truant or get excluded - so they'd be illiterate and still yobs.
2006-08-15 03:24:44 · answer #8 · answered by UKJess 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there is little or no discipline at home (where children spend most of their time), how do schools have a chance in teaching children discipline?
Parents should be the main ones responsible for teaching discipline and right from wrong.
2006-08-15 11:15:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its the parents that need to be strict. school can only do so much and if they set a punishment they are just as likely to be told its not happening by the parents. if the parent had more control over there child they are less likely to be trouble makers
2006-08-15 03:32:51 · answer #10 · answered by Sue B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋