So funny, people saying this administration has morals...how do you account for that? Because he's 'born-again'? (republican translation for 'unaccountable'!)
2006-08-15 02:54:27 · 18 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
still, no answers, only bashing...
2006-08-15 03:05:50 · update #1
ahhhhhhh..turboweegie with the PERSONAL attacks, calling to stop the hate. Very funny...
2006-08-15 03:39:57 · update #2
you're right scuba! Because between a pregnant woman and the doors to the clinic is a crazed anti-choicer waiting with a bomb! LMAO!!!!
2006-08-15 06:45:23 · update #3
Let's just admit that the popularity contest we call democracy excludes ethics and morality for the most part. Personally I thank Clinton for lowering the bar enough that a coke-snorting, booze-swilling, insider-trading, dyslexic, draft-dodging, brain-farting frat boy could follow him in office.
2006-08-15 03:10:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
1. You haters have never proven your claims that Bush used cocaine. Yes, in the real world, thinking people demand proof, not just malicious allegations.
Did you know that Roger Clinton was recorded saying at a drug bust sting that his brother had a nose like a 'vacuum cleaner'? Roger Clinton only had one brother...
2. He is sober. And has been for many, many years. Unlike his red-nosed predecessor.
3. You claim he has no morals, but it is obvious that Bush is a very moral, very Christian person. Again, malicious attacks, but no proof, no data to back up your partisan hate spewings. And, based on your malicious, lie-laden attack on Bush, why would anybody believe you have the least working knowledge of what is 'moral'?
4. Born-again does not mean 'unaccountable'. Not sure what orifice you pulled that idiocy from, but it is typical of the mindless hatred and venom people like you spew.
Get a grip. Stop the hate.
2006-08-15 10:30:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liberal hypocrisy rears it's ugly head again. I guess only liberals can change their lives for the better. For republicans make mistakes in your life, and you are doomed forever. Can't you just feel the love and tolerance from the compassionate set. Yet when Mr. Clinton said he didn't inhale that was completely believable, and totally forgivable. Does anyone else have a hard time taking these people seriously?
katsulover: I don't think anyone really cares if the president has sex in the White House, however lying about it under oath is another matter, hate to tell you that is a criminal act. Further war is not defined as murder, it is killing to be sure, and should be avoided if possible. However, I can not think of any president in recent memory who has not engaged in war type activity. In Mr. Clinton's case for the benefit of your failing memory maybe we should revisit Somalia, Bosnia, and bombing of Iraq to name a couple. One-sided logic doesn't work, but nice try at spinning propaganda to support your cause.
Humanist: No you don't get it. This country is a representative democracy guided by the will of the majority. I did not want Bill Clinton representing me, but the American people disagreed with my opinion, so thus I lived with it. Your problem is you believe your opinion and feelings are more important than the majority. Get over yourself.
still, no answers, only bashing... What an arrogant statement considering your whole point with this question is to bash the president, and the people who support him. Get a life lady!
2006-08-15 10:04:12 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Brilliant. Why didn't I think to ask such an insightful, searching and honest question. I take my hat off to you mam.
The thing is the NEOCONS can't see how ordinary mortals like me might not want such a character to represent me in any shape or form.
I wonder if as part of the health checks done on a president is the capacity to check if the use of cocaine is present in the body?
2006-08-15 10:07:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The most dangerous place in the world to be is standing between a pregnant liberal woman and the doors to an abortion clinic. I love it when liberals speak of morals. Lets murder babies, lets institute gay marriage. pathetic
2006-08-15 10:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would rather a President have sex in the oval office,than a president that starts wars that kill thousands.Sex is momentary death lasts for eternity.You people think having sex aquaits to murder then your morals are suspect.There's nothing worse than a moral hypocrite,hung up on sex,or the lack there of.Get real war is 100% worse,than a liaison with a intern hooker.
So you are saying pot is as bad as cocaine and achole abuse,typical conservative thinking,your reasoning astounds me.
2006-08-15 10:05:26 · answer #6 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The cocaine induced paranoia is really starting to show, I used to be a daily cocaine user , and it seen to me that the pres. is using , watch his face when he talks , he sniffs alot too.
A WORLD LEADER SHOULD NOT BE A PERSON WHO HAS NEEDED A SECOND CHANCE --- Anyone who has ever been addicted deserves a good life and a chance to be part of society ---- not to run the f'n free world.
2006-08-15 10:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by Kid Pecatonica 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
This is a rhetorical "question", right?
An opportunity to dazzle us once again with your insight and logic?
What's the point?
Why not turn off the computer, get up, go out, and find some small way to make a meaningful contribution instead of wasting your life away here?
2006-08-15 10:00:24 · answer #8 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 2⤊ 6⤋
I don't want the mentioned person to represent me.
2006-08-15 10:01:06 · answer #9 · answered by bsure32 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I would also rather have a human being as president..not a "Chimp." He is a laughing-stock around the world. Born-again christians are often hypocrites.
2006-08-15 09:58:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋