The way they broadcast from every where in the war scenes, letting evryone know IT" A DIRECT HIT ON THESE POSITTIONS FROM BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. just kinda lets the terrorists know they hit a good spot and keep firing away at it. Kinda puts our Military at a higher risk. and kind interferes with our efforts to kill them?
2006-08-15 00:17:58 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
i don't think they can be blamed for failures,they can be blamed for encouraging them
2006-08-15 00:21:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
in maximum circumstances the place there is counsel it is deemed to be as we communicate significant to public protection, the information will interrupt the common programming to grant that counsel. And this would many times consequence from the police or another emergency company informing the media that there is an coming near danger to public protection. in addition to, the media has a duty to be careful approximately over emphasizing information for concern it ought to reason a panic. additionally, in the event that they barge into time-honored programming too many times to grant "significant" counsel, they run the prospect of minimizing the magnitude of those emergency proclaims.
2016-10-02 02:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by kucuba 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If this were true, which there is no proof of that, the military wouldn't allow reporters near these locations. They do that in some instances, especially related to surprise attacks, etc., but it is not shown to be an issue in what you are talking about.
2006-08-15 01:51:59 · answer #3 · answered by John J 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
here any one read delayed news for that persons only I will answer., Daily the journalists and media persons are suffering to show the news first on their channel, news paper, internet., We want the news fresh. Then how you will expect media should be responsible
2006-08-15 00:22:28 · answer #4 · answered by JJ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO journalist should EVER be allowed in a combat zone..EVER! And if one goes there, he/she should be provided NO protection whatsoever and treated as the enemy if not properly identified.
2006-08-15 00:41:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think they should use better judgement in what the put on the air.
2006-08-15 00:54:15 · answer #6 · answered by vickit447 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are at no risk. It's a pretty unfare war.
2006-08-15 00:20:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I blame Bush.
2006-08-15 00:19:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"There is a fine line between entertainment and war."
2006-08-15 01:22:18 · answer #9 · answered by Christy W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
absolutly NO
2006-08-15 00:20:54 · answer #10 · answered by mariusmellebye 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋